Hello everyone,
I just did an upgrade from 2.4 to 2.5.7 and now I have some strange
window resize behaviour. When I place the mousecursor on the border of
any window and drag, nothing happens. When i release the button, I can
resize until I click again. The same happens with a single click o a
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Jules Alberts wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just did an upgrade from 2.4 to 2.5.7 and now I have some strange
> window resize behaviour. When I place the mousecursor on the border of
> any window and drag, nothing happens. When i release the button, I c
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 03:55, Jules Alberts wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just did an upgrade from 2.4 to 2.5.7 and now I have some strange
> window resize behaviour. When I place the mousecursor on the border of
> any window and drag, nothing happens. When i release the button, I can
> resize
Op 23 Jul 2003 (10:14), schreef Dominik Vogt :
> AddToFunc my_resize
> + I resize
> mouse 1 sf n my_resize
>
> This works as you would expect.
And it does, thanks! Another question (also new behaviour since the
upgrade). When I try to move gkrellm (2.1.12) it stays where it is
until I re
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:49:24AM +0200, Jules Alberts wrote:
> Op 23 Jul 2003 (10:14), schreef Dominik Vogt :
>
> > AddToFunc my_resize
> > + I resize
> > mouse 1 sf n my_resize
> >
> > This works as you would expect.
>
> And it does, thanks! Another question (also new behaviour since th
Op 23 Jul 2003 (10:59), schreef Dominik Vogt :
> > And it does, thanks! Another question (also new behaviour since the
> > upgrade). When I try to move gkrellm (2.1.12) it stays where it is
> > until I release the mousebutton, then it pops at the position of the
> > mousecursor. Any ideas? Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Jules Alberts wrote:
> Op 23 Jul 2003 (10:59), schreef Dominik Vogt :
>
> > > And it does, thanks! Another question (also new behaviour since the
> > > upgrade). When I try to move gkrellm (2.1.12) it stays where it is
> > > until I release the mousebutton
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 06:31, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Jules Alberts wrote:
> > Op 23 Jul 2003 (10:59), schreef Dominik Vogt :
> >
> > > > And it does, thanks! Another question (also new behaviour since the
> > > > upgrade). When I try to move gkrellm (2.1.12)
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:07:32AM -0400, Ben Winslow wrote:
> Since I could reproduce this, I decided to track it down...
>
> fvwm is indeed trying to grab the pointer and failing [XBell() at
> functions.c:992 in execute_complex_function], however, it's not because
> of anything Jules has done...
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 08:36, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:07:32AM -0400, Ben Winslow wrote:
> > Since I could reproduce this, I decided to track it down...
> >
> > fvwm is indeed trying to grab the pointer and failing [XBell() at
> > functions.c:992 in execute_complex_function]
Op 23 Jul 2003 (14:36), schreef Dominik Vogt :
> Which gkrellm version? It doesn't happen with 1.2.10. Anyway,
> this is a gkrellm bug:
Over here it's version 2.1.12, I got it from freshrpms.net
> An application can not expect that the window manager processes
> any requests (_NEW_WM_ACTIVE_WI
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:07:32AM -0400, Ben Winslow wrote:
> > Since I could reproduce this, I decided to track it down...
> >
> > fvwm is indeed trying to grab the pointer and failing [XBell() at
> > functions.c:992 in execute_comp
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:07:32AM -0400, Ben Winslow wrote:
> > > Since I could reproduce this, I decided to track it down...
> > >
> > > fvwm is indeed trying to g
Op 28 Jul 2003 (16:11), schreef Dominik Vogt :
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > Note that the "problem" does not arise to me with 2.5.7 and I think
> > that it appears _for me_ during your recent work on ConfigureRequest
> > Event.
>
> I don't think so. That
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:07:32AM -0400, Ben Winslow wrote:
> > > > Since I could reproduce this,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:37:17PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 0
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:37:17PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 0
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:08:32AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:37:17PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > In fact I can reproduce the gkrellm problem only on certain condition:
> > > I've a FvwmEvent r
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:52:57AM +0200, fvwm wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:08:32AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:37:17PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > > In fact I can reproduce the gkrel
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:52:57AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:08:32AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:37:17PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > > In fact I can reproduce t
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:32:05AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:52:57AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:08:32AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 0
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> Somethimes I feel like talking to a wall. See my previous mails.
>
I think that you do not understand me. I see bugs that I can reproduce
easily and I want to found a solution. I really care that fvwm can
work well with certain ap
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Somethimes I feel like talking to a wall. See my previous mails.
>
> I think that you do not understand me. I see bugs that I can reproduce
> easily and I want to f
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > Somethimes I feel like talking to a wall. See my previous mails.
> >
> > I think that you do not understand me. I see bugs that I can re
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:44:48PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > Somethimes I feel like talking to a wall. See my previous mails.
> >
> > I think that you do not
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:58:17AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> Dominik Vogt writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > Somethimes I feel like talking to a wall. See my previous mails.
> > >
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:45:12PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:44:48PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > Somethimes I feel like ta
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:39:32PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:58:17AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> > Dominik Vogt writes:
> > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:09:53AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:45:12PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:44:48PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 1
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:56:20AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:09:53AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:45:12PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> > > Please give an example I can reproduce. I think there is some but I would
> > > like to see one
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:49:35 +0200
"Jules Alberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op 23 Jul 2003 (14:36), schreef Dominik Vogt :
>
> > Which gkrellm version? It doesn't happen with 1.2.10. Anyway,
> > this is a gkrellm bug:
>
> Over here it's version 2.1.12, I got it from freshrpms.net
>
> > An
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:15:06PM -0500, Bill Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:49:35 +0200
> "Jules Alberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Op 23 Jul 2003 (14:36), schreef Dominik Vogt :
> >
> > > Which gkrellm version? It doesn't happen with 1.2.10. Anyway,
> > > this is a gkrellm bug
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:48:04AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:15:06PM -0500, Bill Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:49:35 +0200
> > "Jules Alberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Op 23 Jul 2003 (14:36), schreef Dominik Vogt :
> > >
> > > > Which gkrellm v
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:45:23AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:48:04AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:15:06PM -0500, Bill Wilson wrote:
> > This is a very window manager specific problem. I guess almost
> > all window managers grab the poin
34 matches
Mail list logo
