2011/5/4 :
> "Derek B. Noonburg" writes:
>
>> On 2011 May 03, Thomas Funk wrote:
It looks like you set Border/HandleWidth to 1.
>>> This should be standard because borders greater 1 looks so ... so frumpy ;-)
>>
>> I agree that narrow (1-pixel) borders look good, but... I also like
>> being
"Derek B. Noonburg" writes:
> On 2011 May 03, Thomas Funk wrote:
>>>It looks like you set Border/HandleWidth to 1.
>> This should be standard because borders greater 1 looks so ... so frumpy ;-)
>
> I agree that narrow (1-pixel) borders look good, but... I also like
> being able to resize a wind
On 2011 May 03, Thomas Funk wrote:
>>It looks like you set Border/HandleWidth to 1.
> This should be standard because borders greater 1 looks so ... so frumpy ;-)
I agree that narrow (1-pixel) borders look good, but... I also like
being able to resize a window from any edge or corner, and it's re
Heya,
I was also asked to contribute some ideas to a new default config. So I
set up an etherpad to collect the general ideas and wishes for a new
config. Please add your thoughts and wishes and let's do something nice
together.
http://ietherpad.com/rGR0EIESzg
Cheers,
Christine
On 04/30/2011
2011/5/3 Jesús J. Guerrero Botella :
> El día 28 de abril de 2011 17:14, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella
> escribió:
>> El día 28 de abril de 2011 17:00, Thomas Adam escribió:
>>>
>>> So I'll let this patch float around for a bit. If you could give it
>>> some more testing though, with different FvwmB
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: "Rooster Cogburn"
Gesendet: Apr 30, 2011 7:10:16 AM
An: fvwm-workers@fvwm.org
Betreff: FVWM 2.6.X base theme concept
>Out of request by a developer here. I've been interested to have fun
>and give back to the FVWM community with concepts for the default
>the
