Re: Updating Fedora's FVWM

2012-02-08 Thread Thomas Adam
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:16:28PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "DE" == Dan Espen writes: > > DE> There's no "mimeopen" on my Fedora box. Looks like it comes from > DE> package perl-File-MimeInfo. > > Well, sure; that's a manually specified dependency of Fedora's fvwm > package. D

Re: Updating Fedora's FVWM

2012-02-08 Thread Thomas Adam
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:18:27PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "TA" == Thomas Adam writes: > > TA> Now that I've pushed 2.6.4 out, and you've kindly put the tarballs > TA> in place, can you tell me if you've been able to do anything yet on > TA> this, in terms of Fedora packaging?

Re: Updating Fedora's FVWM

2012-02-08 Thread Dan Espen
"Jason L Tibbitts III" writes: >> "TA" == Thomas Adam writes: > > TA> Now that I've pushed 2.6.4 out, and you've kindly put the tarballs > TA> in place, can you tell me if you've been able to do anything yet on > TA> this, in terms of Fedora packaging? > > Well, I've done an initial run and

Re: Updating Fedora's FVWM

2012-02-08 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "TA" == Thomas Adam writes: TA> Now that I've pushed 2.6.4 out, and you've kindly put the tarballs TA> in place, can you tell me if you've been able to do anything yet on TA> this, in terms of Fedora packaging? Well, I've done an initial run and dropped one of the patches since it's unneed