On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:21:51AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Any lasting objections before this is merged and we can move onto the next
> phase with is introducing a default configuration?
>
>
I have some ideas on a default configuration I w
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:21:51AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> We put in place something different. We've had proposals about that in the
> past (Nick Fortune). I'm wanting to hear from others about what that might
> look like.
Call for last orders, Gentlemen...
Any lasting objections before th