On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:38:04 +0200
Bert Geens wrote:
> Hello fellow Fvwm users,
>
> Thomas has started working on a draft for a new configuration format
> that should fix some of the shortcomings of the current one.
There are no shortcomings in the current format :-). It has the
overwhelmingly
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:06:36 +0100
Adam Sjøgren wrote:
> I think it would be much more accurate to call FVWM "mature".
An even better word is "useful" (unlike many linux products under
frenetic active development by folks who believe change is always
good no matter how stupid it is :-).
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:09:19 +0200
Viktor Griph wrote:
> 2012/9/17 Tom Horsley :
> > I found a thread in the archives from back in 2009 saying
> > this issue was fixed:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@fvwm.org/msg01957.html
> >
> >
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:37:06 +0100 (CET)
Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've commited a fix for the dissappearing Windows.
And I just built the CVS version, and the fix does indeed work.
All the test cases no longer have disappearing windows. Thanks!
>There seems to be a problem with GTK and fvwm sometimes not
>getting along.
Additional research shows there is a gnome bugzilla on this
as well, which contains a small test program that reproduces
the bug, so it is even simpler to recreate than running gnucash:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug
There seems to be a problem with GTK and fvwm sometimes not
getting along. I first mentioned this in the fvwm list a while
back:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15827.html
which eventually led to this somewhat silly idea:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15832.ht