On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:48:50PM -0800, Jason Weber wrote:
> I didn't specifically intend to distract you from what you are working on.
No, not at all. I think you've got a more grandiose idea of distraction
than I have. :)
-- Thomas Adam
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:31:51PM -0800, Jason Weber wrote:
>> Well, I think the postponed E7 is fixed in the mentioned update.
>
> OK. That sounds good.
>
>> The screen edges now produce collisions, so a bunched up group of windows
>> near a
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:31:51PM -0800, Jason Weber wrote:
> Well, I think the postponed E7 is fixed in the mentioned update.
OK. That sounds good.
> The screen edges now produce collisions, so a bunched up group of windows
> near a screen edge will get their proxies pushed inwards.
>
> I'll
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 07:50:27AM -0800, Jason Weber wrote:
>> It seems that I should wait. When should we expect the dev cycle to get
>> to new features again?
>
> When 2.6.0 is released. See "Section A" in the following:
>
> https://github
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 07:50:27AM -0800, Jason Weber wrote:
> It seems that I should wait. When should we expect the dev cycle to get
> to new features again?
When 2.6.0 is released. See "Section A" in the following:
https://github.com/ThomasAdam/fvwm/blob/master/docs/todo-2.6
When that is do
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi Jason --
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:55:24PM -0800, Jason Weber wrote:
>> I've got a substantial feature set update to FvwmProxy about ready to check
>> in.
>
> Hmm -- are they bug-fixes? We're in a feature freeze, Jason, and I am
> rea
Hi Jason --
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:55:24PM -0800, Jason Weber wrote:
> I've got a substantial feature set update to FvwmProxy about ready to check
> in.
Hmm -- are they bug-fixes? We're in a feature freeze, Jason, and I am
really anal/crabby/disinterested/against any form of changes which i
I've got a substantial feature set update to FvwmProxy about ready to check in.
I've tried to avoid C++ syntax and the like, but there will probably
be a few compile issues
that don't show up on my Linux build.
Is this a good time?
-- Jason Weber
