fvwm displays the title provided by WM_NAME instead of _NET_WM_NAME

2009-07-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, This was reported by a Debian user. Please retain 339586-forwar...@bugs.debian.org in your responses, so that the Debian BTS may have a copy of your response. ICCCM specifies WM_NAME, as an uninterpreted string, in the latin-1 domain, I think, EWMH specifies _NET_WM_NAME

Re: fvwm displays the title provided by WM_NAME instead of _NET_WM_NAME

2009-07-09 Thread Thomas Adam
2009/7/9 Manoj Srivastava sriva...@golden-gryphon.com: Hi,        This was reported by a Debian user. Please retain  339586-forwar...@bugs.debian.org in your responses, so that the Debian  BTS may have a copy of your response.        ICCCM specifies WM_NAME, as an uninterpreted string, in

Re: fvwm displays the title provided by WM_NAME instead of _NET_WM_NAME

2009-07-09 Thread Thomas Adam
2009/7/9 Thomas Adam thomas.ada...@gmail.com: 2009/7/9 Manoj Srivastava sriva...@golden-gryphon.com: Hi,        This was reported by a Debian user. Please retain  339586-forwar...@bugs.debian.org in your responses, so that the Debian  BTS may have a copy of your response.        ICCCM

Re: fvwm displays the title provided by WM_NAME instead of _NET_WM_NAME

2009-07-09 Thread Thomas Adam
2009/7/9 Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.org: On 2009-07-09 22:43:55 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: Oh -- and I ought to mention, the application itself has to understand UTF8 since it sets the _NET_WM_NAME XAtom in the first place.  You can do this for yourself (I assume you're running under a UTF8

Re: fvwm displays the title provided by WM_NAME instead of _NET_WM_NAME

2009-07-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2009-07-09 22:43:55 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: Oh -- and I ought to mention, the application itself has to understand UTF8 since it sets the _NET_WM_NAME XAtom in the first place. You can do this for yourself (I assume you're running under a UTF8 locale, etc., already): No, on my machine,

Re: fvwm displays the title provided by WM_NAME instead of _NET_WM_NAME

2009-07-09 Thread Viktor Griph
2009/7/10 Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.org: On 2009-07-09 23:33:04 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: I think part of the problem is your continued assertion that WM_NAME is used in preference of _NET_WM_NAME, and it's being blind-sighted a little.  So please, I'd like you to detail step-by-step