Re: Key binding breaks in 2.5.7

On 07 Jun 2003 22:21:21 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Instead of adding the 2.5.7 item, the corresponding 2.5.5 item was > > removed from NEWS. > > > > I think we should start only to add NEWS, not remove them backwards, > > because many users u

Re: StyleById patch voting thread

Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 07 Jun 2003 22:18:20 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > > > WindowStyle does make sense as a separate command. > > When it gets processed, it gets turned into a style > > with an ID so that if there is a restart, it can get reapplied > > to the window. >

Re: StyleById patch voting thread

On 07 Jun 2003 22:18:20 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > WindowStyle does make sense as a separate command. > When it gets processed, it gets turned into a style > with an ID so that if there is a restart, it can get reapplied > to the window. > > In the case you give above: > >Next (Class XTerm)

Re: Key binding breaks in 2.5.7

Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 08 Jun 2003 07:15:02 +0530, Kingsly John wrote: > > > > I have the following line in my config which used to work fine until I > > upgraded to 2.5.7 > > > > Key -XF86Standby A N Exec /usr/X11R6/bin/xset dpms force off > > > > The name of the key

Re: StyleById patch voting thread

Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 07 Jun 2003 14:17:41 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > > > Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > There was same talk about StyleById being temporary and you chose > > WindowSty

Re: Key binding breaks in 2.5.7

On 08 Jun 2003 07:15:02 +0530, Kingsly John wrote: > > I have the following line in my config which used to work fine until I > upgraded to 2.5.7 > > Key -XF86Standby A N Exec /usr/X11R6/bin/xset dpms force off > > The name of the key appears correctly in "xev" but FVWM doesn't seem to > notice

Re: StyleById patch voting thread

On 07 Jun 2003 14:17:41 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > Should the StyleById patch be applied before 2.6? Please cast > > > your votes here. > > > > Seems that there is no conclusion he

Key binding breaks in 2.5.7

I have the following line in my config which used to work fine until I upgraded to 2.5.7 Key -XF86Standby A N Exec /usr/X11R6/bin/xset dpms force off The name of the key appears correctly in "xev" but FVWM doesn't seem to notice the key-press at all.(I ran FvwmDebug and tried pressing the key) I

FvwmIdent sometimes blank

Anyone else seen this? I have FvwmIdent configured like this: *FvwmIdent: Back Black *FvwmIdent: Fore white *FvwmIdent: Font 9x15bold I invoke it with a keypress: Key F3 A M Module FvwmIdent Sometimes the FvwmIdent window comes up all black. I don't see anything on stderr

Re: StyleById patch voting thread

Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > Should the StyleById patch be applied before 2.6? Please cast > > your votes here. > > > > Seems that there is no conclusion here. It seems that there is two > votes for it (me and Mikh

Re: StyleById patch voting thread

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > Should the StyleById patch be applied before 2.6? Please cast > your votes here. > Seems that there is no conclusion here. It seems that there is two votes for it (me and Mikhael) one vote against (Dominik) and one unclear vote (Dan)