CVS write access for Scott?

2004-06-03 Thread Dominik Vogt
I think we should give CVS write access to Scott. Anybody to second that opinion? (To Scott: I know I promised to look more closely at the window specific key bindings patch, but I just don't find the time to do it since I became a freelancer. I think the functionality is fine. The only concer

Re: iconfile and miniiconfile variables

2004-06-03 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:47:06PM +0100, Tavis Ormandy wrote: > > I've found the iconfile and miniiconfile variables really handy, but the > only limitation is that without knowing the ImagePath, their use is limited > to within fvwm image settings..with a minor alteration to get the full > path,

CVS domivogt: * Fixed EWMH_FULLSCREEN initial state and handling of other initial EWMH states.

2004-06-03 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt04/06/03 07:43:24 Modified files: . : ChangeLog fvwm : add_window.c ewmh.c ewmh.h ewmh_events.c expand.c fvwm.1.in window_flags.h tests

Re: CVS write access for Scott?

2004-06-03 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we should give CVS write access to Scott. Anybody to > second that opinion? Mikhael proposed this on 31-May so you've just seconded it. -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at http

Re: CVS write access for Scott?

2004-06-03 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:44:52AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think we should give CVS write access to Scott. Anybody to > > second that opinion? > > Mikhael proposed this on 31-May so you've just seconded it. Hrm. I suggested it two days before, bu

Notification: incoming/1296

2004-06-03 Thread fvwm-bug
FVWM Bug Tracking notification new message incoming/1296 Message summary for PR#1296 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: StartsOnPage SkipMapping failure Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:42:13 -0500 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < >From [E

Re: CVS write access for Scott?

2004-06-03 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:44:52AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think we should give CVS write access to Scott. Anybody to > > second that opinion? > > Mikhael proposed this on 31-May so you've just seconded it. > And I second it too ... now. Olivier

Re: Notification: incoming/1289

2004-06-03 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:14:10PM -0500, fvwm-bug wrote: > FVWM Bug Tracking notification > > new message incoming/1289 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] fvwm-2.4.18]$ ./configure --enable-extras --prefix=/usr > [ omitted.. ] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] fvwm-2.4.18]$ make > cd . && autoheader > autoheader: WARNING:

Re: CVS write access for Scott?

2004-06-03 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 03 Jun 2004 15:05:29 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:44:52AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think we should give CVS write access to Scott. Anybody to > > > second that opinion? > > > > Mikhael proposed this on 31-May so

win-specific bindings syntax (was: CVS write access for Scott?)

2004-06-03 Thread Scott Smedley
Hi Dominik, : I think we should give CVS write access to Scott. Anybody to : second that opinion? Can I vote? :) : (To Scott: I know I promised to look more closely at the window : specific key bindings patch, but I just don't find the time to do : it since I became a freelancer. I think the