CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 06:48:09
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.c
libs : alloca.c
Log message:
Removed old debug code from alloca.c
Corrected a minor typo in fvwm.c
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: griph 06/07/08 08:03:28
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog NEWS configure.ac
Log message:
added EXEEXT to FvwmGtk to work under Cygwin. (bug #3772)
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: griph 06/07/08 09:42:17
Modified files:
. : Tag: branch-2_4 ChangeLog NEWS configure.in
modules: Tag: branch-2_4 ChangeLog
modules/FvwmConsole: Tag: branch-2_4 FvwmConsoleC.c getlin
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 09:57:42
fvwm/compat
Update of /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat
In directory util9.math.uh.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv3957/compat
Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat added to the repository
On 7/8/06, FVWM CVS wrote:
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 09:57:42
fvwm/compat
Update of /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat
In directory util9.math.uh.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv3957/compat
Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat added to the repo
Hi.
What do you think of separating the compatibility code (replacement
functions) from libfvwm?
Functions like strncasecmp or strdup are spread all over the code. For
systems that do not have them availiable, libfvwm is responsible for
providing them. But the question is, should this be the res
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
> CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
> Module name: fvwm
> Changes by: renato 06/07/07 18:34:31
>
> Modified files:
> . : ChangeLog
> fvwm : fvwm.1.in fvwm.c
>
> Log message:
> Removed the warning abo
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:58:46PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What do you think of separating the compatibility code (replacement
> functions) from libfvwm?
>
> Functions like strncasecmp or strdup are spread all over the code. For
> systems that do not have them availiable, libfvwm
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
> CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
> Module name: fvwm
> Changes by: renato 06/07/07 18:34:31
>
> Modified files:
> . : ChangeLog
> fvwm : fvwm.1.in
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:58:46PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What do you think of separating the compatibility code (replacement
> functions) from libfvwm?
>
> Functions like strncasecmp or strdup are spread all over the code. For
On 7/8/06, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
> > CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
> > Module name: fvwm
> > Changes by: renato 06/07/07 18:34:31
> >
> > Modified files:
> >
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 17:55:21
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
Log message:
Corrected a mistake in a previous entry of ChangeLog
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:48:43PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 7/8/06, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
> >> > CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
> >> > Module name:
On 7/9/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:48:43PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 7/8/06, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
>
14 matches
Mail list logo