seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a possibility for 3.0, could the module interface be reworked perhaps
more extensively?
I had an idea for an ICE-based module interface that would, if well
done, be more flexible and extensible than the c
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
"seventh guardian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the
effects of
seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
> Ok, what about this:
>
> Some options are now deactivated by prefixing ! to the option. This
> will eventually be the default, and the old negative options are
> now de
seventh guardian wrote:
Ok, what about this:
Some options are now deactivated by prefixing ! to the option. This
will eventually be the default, and the old negative options are
now deprecated.
This is a list of MenuStyle deprecated negative options:
AutomaticHotkeysOff, HilightBackOff, TitleWar
seventh guardian wrote:
Lol.. Yes, but how do you specify if its an "and" or an "or"?
What about the words "and" and "or"? The symbols '&' and '|' could be
supported as well.
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 01:28:45AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
but if one are really paranoid one could
add checks of the opened files in FvwmCommand.c to verify that they are
fifos with correect permissions.
Ah, but it's too late if the file is open already.
Is
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:18:30PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
Having just looked into how Schedule & execute_complex_function() work,
I'm not prepared to blame Schedule just yet.
In my opinion, I don't think FVWM should grab the X server everytime it
executes a complex f
