Re: piperead arithmentic

2003-03-24 Thread Marcin Pawlik
i click on it. > > Look like the solaris /bin/sh does not know the "$(( ... ))" syntax. Checked in 5.9 and it really doesn't. > What is the most portable syntax for arithmetic expansion? Probably using (external) expr, but AFAIR the $(( )) arithmetic expansion should

Re: deiconification bug [was CVS domivogt: * Removed key release bindings.]

2003-03-12 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Wed, Mar 12 at 13:58, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 12 Mar 2003 13:54:09 +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >> >> I thought about a situation when after finding something suspitious I >> could replace my own configuration with a simple "bug reporting" one >> tak

Re: deiconification bug [was CVS domivogt: * Removed key release bindings.]

2003-03-12 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Wed, Mar 12 at 08:10, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:21:20AM +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >> Apropos - maybe there could be some "bug reporting configuration"? I >> think about a file containing only the default fvwm settings, without >>

Re: deiconification bug [was CVS domivogt: * Removed key release bindings.]

2003-03-11 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Tue, Mar 11 at 23:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:52:13AM +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >> A simple test: >> >> - Create xterm window >> - All (xterm) Iconify >> - Change desk >> - All (xterm) Iconify off >> - All (xterm) Pla

Re: deiconification bug [was CVS domivogt: * Removed key release bindings.]

2003-03-10 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Tue, Mar 11 at 01:12, Marcin Pawlik wrote: > The problem was (and still is) in iconification/deiconification of > windows followed by PlaceAgain command. If I iconify a window, move > (GotoDesk) to another desktop then deiconify the window and do > PlaceAgain for it, the window is

deiconification bug [was CVS domivogt: * Removed key release bindings.]

2003-03-10 Thread Marcin Pawlik
ain for it, the window is moved to the desk where it was iconified. It even prints "map on new desk:" on stderr now. When I replace SGET_START_DESK(style) parameter in PlaceWindow invocation in CMD_PlaceAgain function with 0, it behaves OK but this hack is probably not a real solution. Re

Re: manpage question

2003-02-25 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Tue, Feb 25 at 08:21, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:28:52AM +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 24 at 22:01, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: >>> On 24 Feb 2003 19:09:15 +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >>>> >>>>>> If so, is the

Re: manpage question

2003-02-24 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Mon, Feb 24 at 22:01, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 24 Feb 2003 19:09:15 +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >> >>>> If so, is there any way to check if window has "!CirculateHit"? >>> >>> Yes, you can simply say >>> >>> Pick (Cir

Re: manpage question

2003-02-24 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Mon, Feb 24 at 18:11, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:59:10PM +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >> >> So when I say "Pick (cond) foo" it usualy means "do foo on chosen >> window if it satisfies cond" but if cond is for example >> &

Re: manpage question

2003-02-24 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Mon, Feb 24 at 00:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 04:48:44AM +0100, Marcin Pawlik wrote: >> In the descriptions of Current, None, Any, Pick, PointerWindow, and >> ThisWindow commands there is a part saying "The command (...) implies >> t

manpage question

2003-02-22 Thread Marcin Pawlik
oint in putting this conditions on commands like Pick. I tried if it works as described (by invoking commands on window with CirculateSkip style) and I think it does not. Is this an manpage incorrectness? Regards, -- Marcin Pawlik -- Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.

Re: Bug in Break command once again

2003-02-22 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 02:10:22PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > Marcin Pawlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I applied the changes and it works for my previous example, but I >> still have problems using Break with Piperead. In functions like: >> >> DestroyFunc MPTe

Bug in Break command once again

2003-02-21 Thread Marcin Pawlik
I applied the changes and it works for my previous example, but I still have problems using Break with Piperead. In functions like: DestroyFunc MPTest AddToFuncMPTest + I Piperead "echo Break" + I Echo "Not working" The text is printed and I think it shouldn't

Re: Bug in Break command?

2003-02-21 Thread Marcin Pawlik
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:45:04PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > Marcin Pawlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I tried Break command and it doesn't seem to work. For example >> function: >> >> DestroyFunc MPTest >> AddToFuncMPTest >> + I Break

Bug in Break command?

2003-02-21 Thread Marcin Pawlik
I tried Break command and it doesn't seem to work. For example function: DestroyFunc MPTest AddToFuncMPTest + I Break + I Echo "Not working" always prints the text. Maybe I don't understand how it should be used... Tested on current (Feb 21) CVS version. Regards

New MenuStyle options

2002-12-26 Thread Marcin Pawlik
any prefered coding style? I tried to stay consistent with the code I was changing but it is difficult sometimes. Regards, -- Marcin Pawlik menustyle_options.patch.gz Description: Binary data edge_command.patch.gz Description: Binary data