On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:52:00PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 05 Jun 2003 18:16:24 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:39:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
We don't seem to have the png or colorset support in FvwmBanner.
So if a logo with an alpha channel
On 06 Jun 2003 09:15:10 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:52:00PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 05 Jun 2003 18:16:24 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:39:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
We don't seem to have the png or colorset
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:38:12AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
I'm speaking about tarball size, not executable size.
So it will be 2283442 instead of 2243442 for each new logo. Why not?
Because the gain you get for the additional size is close to zero.
It's against the philosophy fvwm
On 06 Jun 2003 10:12:57 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:38:12AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
I'm speaking about tarball size, not executable size.
So it will be 2283442 instead of 2243442 for each new logo. Why not?
Because the gain you get for the additional
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 06 Jun 2003 10:12:57 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:38:12AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
I'm speaking about tarball size, not executable size.
So it will be 2283442 instead of 2243442 for each new logo. Why not?
Because the
Alex Wallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 06 Jun 2003 10:12:57 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:38:12AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
I'm speaking about tarball size, not executable size.
So it will be 2283442 instead of 2243442
Dan Espen wrote:
Alex Wallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
I don't see a problem to distribute 2-3 logos in 3 variants (or include
them all into C source if they are xpm/xbm).
How about including new banners in an updated fvwm-icons package? Then
it is left
Alex Wallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan Espen wrote:
Alex Wallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
I don't see a problem to distribute 2-3 logos in 3 variants (or include
them all into C source if they are xpm/xbm).
How about including new banners in
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:39:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
We don't seem to have the png or colorset support in FvwmBanner.
There is png support in FvwmBanner. There is just a bug ... fixed
soon (I hope).
However, the support is limited: no alpha blending! if a point has
an alpha of =
On 06 Jun 2003 17:41:24 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:39:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
We don't seem to have the png or colorset support in FvwmBanner.
There is png support in FvwmBanner. There is just a bug ... fixed
soon (I hope).
Thanks, it is fixed.
10 matches
Mail list logo
