On 27 Feb 2002 12:53:05 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:58:05AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
[snip]
I did not say that other commands *can* not have a return code but
that they *do* not have one. My
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:43:29AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 24 Feb 2002 01:42:09 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
[SNIP, see mailing list archive for more details]
I've made a shot at the if-else syntax. Now, all conditional
commands (and only conditional commands) have a return
On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:43:29AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 24 Feb 2002 01:42:09 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
[SNIP, see mailing list archive for more details]
I've made a shot at the if-else syntax. Now, all conditional
On 27 Feb 2002 10:58:05 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
We shouldn't mix both because it would become hard to understand for
example
Current (foobar) Read file
returns (the rc of Read or the rc of Current?).
It should
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:58:05AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
[snip]
I did not say that other commands *can* not have a return code but
that they *do* not have one. My intentions was to keep the return
code of conditionals separate
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:40:51AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 27 Feb 2002 10:58:05 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
We shouldn't mix both because it would become hard to understand for
example
Current (foobar) Read
On 27 Feb 2002 13:12:02 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:40:51AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
If you think this is a mix, yes, but it is not different from this:
Current (foobar) Next (foobar2) Close
For me it should return:
* Current syntax:
On 24 Feb 2002 01:42:09 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
[SNIP, see mailing list archive for more details]
I've made a shot at the if-else syntax. Now, all conditional
commands (and only conditional commands) have a return code that
can be true (1), false (0) or error (-1). There are three new
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:05:51AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 05 Aug 2001 13:34:02 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
How about this enhancement to conditional commands:
Next (conditions) { false-action } true-action
This would allow an else case in all conditional commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ask me, I would place a real interpreter language, tcl is fine.
But this does not seem possible. This would require an absolutely new
syntax. I am ready to rewrite hundreds of kilobytes of fvwm-themes
configs, but I fear that some others have problems to
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:15:36AM +0100, Tim Phipps wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ask me, I would place a real interpreter language, tcl is fine.
But this does not seem possible. This would require an absolutely new
syntax. I am ready to rewrite hundreds of kilobytes of
fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
I'd be content to have a solution for
these problems:
1) If a certain window exists, kill it; if not, start it.
AddToFunc temp_true_list
+ I Prev (certain_window) Close
AddToFunc temp_true
+ I DestroyFunc temp
+ I AddToFunc temp I temp_true_list
AddToFunc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Aug 2001 13:34:02 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
How about this enhancement to conditional commands:
Next (conditions) { false-action } true-action
This may work, but is this the best possible solution? This syntax is not
very readable and having
On 06 Aug 2001 10:01:51 +0100, Tim Phipps wrote:
I think we can already do conditional code using self modifying
functions:
Ah yes, I forgot, I use self modifying functions in fvwm-themes to
implement a state. But I would prefer functions to be used on purpose,
to define an interface with
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:01:51AM +0100, Tim Phipps wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Aug 2001 13:34:02 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
How about this enhancement to conditional commands:
Next (conditions) { false-action } true-action
This may work, but is this the best
On 05 Aug 2001 13:34:02 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
How about this enhancement to conditional commands:
Next (conditions) { false-action } true-action
This would allow an else case in all conditional commands
without the need to store a return code of these commands. For
example:
16 matches
Mail list logo