Re: [FW-1] SPLAT versus RHEL 3.0

2007-09-04 Thread sin
Jeremy Lieb wrote: Good afternoon. I'm trying to come up with some compelling reasons to switch from pure Enterprise Linux for our firewalls and Smart Center to SPLAT. I've been playing around with SPLAT for months and much prefer it to the standard RHEL Checkpoint installation but I'm running in

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, cisco4ng wrote: I made a few changes to the rule. I use http instead of scp and I assign a weigh of 90 to http and 15 to ftp. I have two http sessions and two ftp sessions running at the same time downloading a 100MB file size. I started two http sessions first. I star

Re: [FW-1] SPLAT versus RHEL 3.0

2007-09-04 Thread Sergio Alvarez
The drivers issue is a complete pain, I agree with that, but SPLAT is a platform especially modified by Check Point to their firewall or SmartCenter, that guarantees a high level of security and stability. I work for a CCSP and our CP presales guys always ask for us to suggest our customers to go

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread cisco4ng
I made a few changes to the rule. I use http instead of scp and I assign a weigh of 90 to http and 15 to ftp. I have two http sessions and two ftp sessions running at the same time downloading a 100MB file size. I started two http sessions first. I started two FTP sessions immediate

Re: [FW-1] Problem renewing SecuRemote certificate

2007-09-04 Thread Ray
Sneaker-net. :-) Once it's expired, it's expired. You will need to issue a new certificate and get it to them somehow or use the "pull" method where they enter the code they receive by email to get a new certificate. If you're running current versions of FW-1 and SecuRemote/SecureClient, the

Re: [FW-1] Problem renewing SecuRemote certificate

2007-09-04 Thread Ray
Great! Thanks for the follow-up note, Ray From: Richard Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM Subject: Re: [FW-1] Problem renewing SecuRemote certificate Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:27:58 -0400

[FW-1] SPLAT versus RHEL 3.0

2007-09-04 Thread Jeremy Lieb
Good afternoon. I'm trying to come up with some compelling reasons to switch from pure Enterprise Linux for our firewalls and Smart Center to SPLAT. I've been playing around with SPLAT for months and much prefer it to the standard RHEL Checkpoint installation but I'm running into static from my sup

Re: [FW-1] Connections from encryption domain to SecureClient

2007-09-04 Thread David DeSimone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wayne Keatts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I need to allow connections from our lan to SecureClient. I have > created an IP NAT Pool, and applied it to SecureClient connections. A > sniffer on the local lan shows traffic from the SecureClient is ind

Re: [FW-1] Connections from encryption domain to SecureClient

2007-09-04 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Sergio Alvarez wrote: I believe instead of IP Pool NAT, what you need is Office Mode. You can find details about it in the VPN pdf document you will find in your installation disks and is also available at the Check Point website. There is a limitation. back connections to

Re: [FW-1] Connections from encryption domain to SecureClient

2007-09-04 Thread Sergio Alvarez
I believe instead of IP Pool NAT, what you need is Office Mode. You can find details about it in the VPN pdf document you will find in your installation disks and is also available at the Check Point website. Regards On 9/4/07, Wayne Keatts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I need to allow connecti

[FW-1] Connections from encryption domain to SecureClient

2007-09-04 Thread Wayne Keatts
I need to allow connections from our lan to SecureClient. I have created an IP NAT Pool, and applied it to SecureClient connections. A sniffer on the local lan shows traffic from the SecureClient is indeed being NAT'ed behind this pool. However, if we try to connect to the SecureClient from the

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread cisco4ng
Thanks everyone for your input. I am going to try with http and ftp (instead of ftp and scp, even though all of my clients and servers are Linux/solaris with 2GB of RAM and dual 3.2 Ghz CPU boxes). Yes, I realize that this is a small scale; however, I would think that in a small test scale envir

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread Warrington Bruce - bwarri
I think part of your results are just due to your test lab setup. First I'd say try to force the NIC and switch settings down to 10Mb full duplex for that small of a throughput test, so you're total traffic exceeds the available bandwidth, and see if QOS doesn't do more of what you expect it to

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread Roger P Herr
I agree fully with Hugh on the weight distribution based on the rule (meaning distributed by protocol) however my concern was why 50Mbs when the link was 100Mbs? Roger Herr WhyNot? Consulting Services 24165 IH 10 West Suite 217-183 San Antonio, Texas 78257 210-860-3990 Some men see things as t

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, cisco4ng wrote: I have a question for checkpoint flood-gate gurus in the forum. I have NG AI R55 with HFA_20 running on SPLAT enforcement module. This module is being managed from a Provider-1 NG AI R55 with HFA_20. I have single firewall at the moment but I configure Clu

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread cisco4ng
Hi, Yes, I checeked QoS at the network topology. I have everything set to 100Mbps because everything is connected to a Cisco 2950 Catalyst switch. I have this setup in my lab environment. I still have issues. Please help. Thanks. Pedro Boavida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,

Re: [FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread Pedro Boavida
Hi, Did you checked wich interface has QoS at the network topology ? Best regards, -Original Message- From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cisco4ng Sent: terça-feira, 4 de Setembro de 2007 15:59 To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOIN

[FW-1] Question about Floodgate

2007-09-04 Thread cisco4ng
I have a question for checkpoint flood-gate gurus in the forum. I have NG AI R55 with HFA_20 running on SPLAT enforcement module. This module is being managed from a Provider-1 NG AI R55 with HFA_20. I have single firewall at the moment but I configure ClusterXL on this firewall because I

Re: [FW-1] Need drivers for splat on Dell PowerEdge 1950

2007-09-04 Thread Sergio Alvarez
According with the Hardware Compatibility List in the Check Point website: http://www.checkpoint.com/services/techsupport/hcl/all.html Your 1950 with PERC controller is supported starting from R60, if you are trying to install R60 o R61, you will need a particular ISO and will need help from the

Re: [FW-1] Need drivers for splat on Dell PowerEdge 1950

2007-09-04 Thread Jørn Dahl-Stamnes
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 15:57, pkc_mls wrote: > Gil Hananya a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm trying to install splat on new Dell PowerEdge 1950 with PERC 5 raid > > controller, but can't get it install. > > > > I think I need driver for the PERC. > > > > Please advise/help > > hello, > if

Re: [FW-1] Need drivers for splat on Dell PowerEdge 1950

2007-09-04 Thread pkc_mls
Gil Hananya a écrit : Hi, I'm trying to install splat on new Dell PowerEdge 1950 with PERC 5 raid controller, but can't get it install. I think I need driver for the PERC. Please advise/help hello, if the server is on the HCL from checkpoint website, they should indicate which releas

Re: [FW-1] Problem renewing SecuRemote certificate

2007-09-04 Thread John Lindblom
This raises a question for me. How are end user certificates handled when they expire if they can't be renewed? I just started using certificates and I need to plan for issues with expiration. John Richard

[FW-1] Need drivers for splat on Dell PowerEdge 1950

2007-09-04 Thread Gil Hananya
Hi, I'm trying to install splat on new Dell PowerEdge 1950 with PERC 5 raid controller, but can't get it install. I think I need driver for the PERC. Please advise/help Gil = To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages, send an ema