-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ray wrote:
>> - (depending on the usage) no additional software to install
>
> There's always extra software to install unless you're just doing HTTPS
> connections. Whether it's installed by you or by download (and you have to
> give the end user e
> - (depending on the usage) no additional software to install
There's always extra software to install unless you're just doing HTTPS
connections. Whether it's installed by you or by download (and you have to give
the end user elevated rights, which causes a whole different set of problems),
y
On 10/24/07, sin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robby Cauwerts wrote:
> > On 10/24/07, Hugo van der Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Given the choice between SSL VPN and IPSEC VPN I will choose IPSEC 8
> >> days of the week.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hugo.
> >
> >
> > Why?
> > I only see benefits wh
Hi.
Has anyone set up QOS for VOIP on Checkpoint using Diffserv or LLC?
Any recommendations regarding procedure and constant bitrate/maximal delay
would be greatly appreciated,
thanks
Mick.
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away m
On Oct 24, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cory Rau wrote:
We've recently replaced our 2 Nokia IP330's with UTM-1 2050's. We
used
to provide remote access to our salespeople via SecureClient (they're
mostly Mac). The circuit to our
Robby Cauwerts wrote:
On 10/24/07, Hugo van der Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the choice between SSL VPN and IPSEC VPN I will choose IPSEC 8
days of the week.
Hugo.
Why?
I only see benefits when using SSL VPN's instead of IPSEC VPN's, as
discussed over and over:
- (depending on th
On 10/24/07, Hugo van der Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Given the choice between SSL VPN and IPSEC VPN I will choose IPSEC 8
> days of the week.
>
>
> Hugo.
Why?
I only see benefits when using SSL VPN's instead of IPSEC VPN's, as
discussed over and over:
- (depending on the usage) no add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris van der Merwe wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Thanks to everyone who offered ideas. In the end, I tried taking the Quad
> card out of the box and SecurePlatform could not actually start the
> networking anymore. But with a quick re-install of SecurePlat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cory Rau wrote:
> We've recently replaced our 2 Nokia IP330's with UTM-1 2050's. We used
> to provide remote access to our salespeople via SecureClient (they're
> mostly Mac). The circuit to our main office is only a T1 but
> performance was always q
We've recently replaced our 2 Nokia IP330's with UTM-1 2050's. We
used to provide remote access to our salespeople via SecureClient
(they're mostly Mac). The circuit to our main office is only a T1
but performance was always quite acceptable mainly because they're
running Citrix connectio
Steve,
Yes we have a outbound NAT rule configured, it should not need it though
as the device in the DMZ never initiates a connection out through the
firewall.
From: Steve Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:42 AM
To: Larso
Paolo,
Thank you for your response, we've already checked that and SecureXL is
disabled (we also tried setting ipso flows to slowpath). I'm thinking
the issue is more layer 2 between the firewall and upstream switch, we
just can't get it isolated.
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list fo
If I understand you correctly, the VPN device on the other side and the
webserver, which is accessable via HTTP (443) have the same IP. Assuming
that you do not have to pass HTTPS over the VPN tunnel for any other reason
(i.e. to another server) you could also go into the VPN community advanced
pro
Hi Guys,
Thanks to everyone who offered ideas. In the end, I tried taking the Quad card
out of the box and SecurePlatform could not actually start the networking
anymore. But with a quick re-install of SecurePlatform, everything worked fine
(with just the 2 onboard NIC's installed).
So, now it
Rafaël Olivier a écrit :
Hi,
Thanks for your answers !
The connection to webserver is supposed to go directly on the Internet, not
through the VPN Tunnel.
So, VPN errors should not occur.
But the webserver and remote gateway (for Site2Site VPN) are the same machine
(same IP). That may confl
Hi,
Thanks for your answers !
The connection to webserver is supposed to go directly on the Internet, not
through the VPN Tunnel.
So, VPN errors should not occur.
But the webserver and remote gateway (for Site2Site VPN) are the same machine
(same IP). That may conflict.
(I already opened a c
Hi the webserver has to be reached by the tunnel or by internet directly?
when you write:
=> we setup a rule to allow this connection, directly, not through the VPN
Tunnel
it seems to be in clear (no in tunnel), is it right?
And I agree pkc if it has to pass through the tunnel you should c
Rafaël Olivier a écrit :
Hello All,
Hi,
We setup a Site2Site VPN with a customer.
This VPN Tunnel is correctly working.
The customer is asking us to access a webserver which is hosted on the remote VPN gateway, on port 443. (so remote VPN Gateway is managing the Site2Site VPN and the Webse
HI,
try to disable Secure XL whit cpconfig.
I have a case for these issue, almost the same behavior.
ciao
-- Paolo Riviello Mob. +39.328.1749468 Home: http://www.paoloriviello.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: pao_rivi -I'm a
rebel, soul rebel I'm a capturer,
It is fixed in HFA01.
2007/10/24, Tom Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It is a lovely feature that I hope they can fix soon, I brought it to
> there
> attention as soon as R65 came out.
>
> =
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send
Hello All,
We setup a Site2Site VPN with a customer.
This VPN Tunnel is correctly working.
The customer is asking us to access a webserver which is hosted on the remote
VPN gateway, on port 443. (so remote VPN Gateway is managing the Site2Site VPN
and the Webserver)
=> we setup a rule to a
21 matches
Mail list logo
