Tom Louis a écrit :
I have finally filled up out 800 Gig of disc on my Log
server and was curious as to what people are doing for
archiving these files.
Depends how you other logs or files are archived, but a tape archive
could be a good idea.
Ask also if there is a policy regarding the re
Contact me offline and I would try to go over some possible tips and tricks
to make it work.
thx.
rajeev
On Feb 6, 2008 5:13 PM, cisco4ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a P-1 (manager + Container) in the same box running R55 with
> HFA_20.
> I have a single CMA in there.
>
> I need to genera
Thanks Minh, but the question still stands, how do you clear this
without waiting 30 days? You could have a change in your user database
that would not allow any new user to connect since the old user is
cached up in this table.
-GS
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of
All right,
Finally got a confirmed answer directly from CP.
SNX Licence is counted differently depending on the product:
-Connectra: Number of concurrent connected users
-VPN1: Licensed by user
The way it works is that everytime a user authenticates to the gateway
via SNX, the username is entere
Tom Louis wrote:
I have finally filled up out 800 Gig of disc on my Log
server and was curious as to what people are doing for
archiving these files.
rotate them and move them to a backup device :)
Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
===
I have finally filled up out 800 Gig of disc on my Log
server and was curious as to what people are doing for
archiving these files.
I am running R-65 on SPLAT.
Just looking for Ideas to formulate a solution
Thank You in advance for any suggestions at all.
We use Veriats Netbackup.
Scanne
cisco4ng wrote:
That's what I was told by TAC: "if you can NOT read the cpinfo output file with
infoview/p-1_infoview, neither can we"
other than ask them for a fix for your cpinfo issue i don't know what
else could you do.
=
To set vacation, O
On Feb 7, 2008 2:44 PM, cisco4ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what I was told by TAC: "if you can NOT read the cpinfo output file
> with
> infoview/p-1_infoview, neither can we"
You could try to upgrade your cpinfo binary.
Sidney
=
To set
That's what I was told by TAC: "if you can NOT read the cpinfo output file with
infoview/p-1_infoview, neither can we"
sin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: cisco4ng wrote:
> I already know how to do that. I read that before asking the forum.
>
> So what is the solution?
If you can't read it it doesn'
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Markus Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> SO my Question: Can I somehow get it to work that my Firewall accepts
>> non VPN Traffic to NET_C, WHILE LEAVING NET_C in the encryption Domain?
>> (For my German Partners?)
>> I CAN NOT change the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SO my Question: Can I somehow get it to work that my Firewall accepts
> non VPN Traffic to NET_C, WHILE LEAVING NET_C in the encryption Domain?
> (For my German Partners?)
> I CAN NOT change the configurati
Hello,
I'm the Administrator at Berlin. Behind my R65 FW are two Networks as
encryption Domain, a internet public (routable) class C network (NET_C)
and a private (172.x) class B Network (NET_B).
In the past, only the public NET_C was used, and is defined as the
encryption Domain of a "FW_Berlin"
cisco4ng wrote:
I already know how to do that. I read that before asking the forum.
So what is the solution?
If you can't read it it doesn't mean CP TAC can't read it.
Send them the resulting file along with what the console output says and
then wait for them to answer.
also, make sure t
13 matches
Mail list logo
