Good job, Check Point!
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/041211-hacker-exploit-firewalls.html
NSS Labs independently tested the Check Point Power-1 11065, the Cisco ASA
5585-40, the Fortinet Fortigate 3950, the Juniper SRX 5800, the Palo Alto
Networks PA-4020, and the SonicWall NSA E8500.
Hi list,
If there is a level 3 hardware between the smart center and the clusters, do
not forget to clear the arp table of level 3 hardware or you could not be able
to install the policy.
regards
Gustavo Andrade
Analista de Segurança da Informação Pl
True Access Consulting S/A
Fone: (61) 3217
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 18:31, Leandro Vilela wrote:
> Hy list,
> I'm having a cluster that SPLAT with hardware problems.
> I purchased two new servers and need to replace equipment. I did the
> settings of the new servers identical to the former but not the policies
> yet. The idea is to simply u
Hy list,
I'm having a cluster that SPLAT with hardware problems.
I purchased two new servers and need to replace equipment. I did the
settings of the new servers identical to the former but not the policies
yet. The idea is to simply unplug the old cluster, reconnect the new servers
with same IP an
Hi there,
Not using DNS is a mojor problem like not taking care of proper time
keeping.
Of course you can solve this problem like this thread is suggesting but I
would
still opt for propper DNS name resolving.
Cheers
Z. Jakubowski
=
To set va
Hi all,
Is there a way to force the proxy IDs checkpoint will use for a
dedicated tunnel ?
I'd like to specify a shorter network for a vpn with a remote part, due
to overlapping.
(10.10.0.0/16 -> 10.10.2.0/24).
but other tunnels use 10.10.0.0/16 already and tunnels ends up to the
same vpn
