On 30.11.2011 08:34, a bv wrote:
On the R70.20 Resolved Issues
page
(https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=solutionid=sk43167js_peid=P-114a7ba5fd7-10001partition=Generalproduct=Edge
[1],)
I see an entry 00517830,
00517476,
On 30.11.2011 00:52, Clive Luk wrote:
Dear list,
I just
want some advice on UTM-1 upgrade. I am currently running 2 UTM-1
R70.40. I am thinking of upgrading. Should I stick with R70? or should I
go to R75?
The reason I am upgrading is I found the appliances
has been acting
weird
On 30.11.2011 08:55, a bv wrote:
omega kernel: [fw_0];FW-1: Log
buffer for tsid=0 vsid=0 is full
Please read the relevant
SecureKnowledge documents.
Like:
https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=solutionid=sk52100
Hugo.
--
Thanks your reply Hugo!
The weird issues actually including high cpu usage.
and I am running 2 utm-1 in active/standby mode. sometime when i install
new rule. the current active fw will become standby and the standby will
be came active. I will be receiving alert saying fw is not in sync.
Do we here talk about Address Range as range object type? What this
address range is used for ? you can define network objects also , is
it similar but not subnet mask is used?
Regards
2011/11/30 a bv vbavbal...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On the R70.20 Resolved Issues page
