Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
cisco4ng
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:24 AM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] IPSO 4.x and Checkpoint NGx combination explaination
needed
Guys,
There is no
Guys,
There is no need for name calling here. Programmers from 3rd world countries
such
as Vietnam, India and China, IMHO, are excellent programmers. I also find
that the
programmers from 3rd world countries are very hard working people. For paying
them a few dollars a day, may be
Guys,
There is no need for name calling here. Programmers from 3rd world countries
such
as Vietnam, India and China, IMHO, are excellent programmers. I also find
that the
programmers from 3rd world countries are very hard working people. For paying
them a few dollars a day, may be
I agree with the first part of your statement... but what is the problem
with programmers from 3rd world countries??
On 9/25/06, no-need to-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neither DOES Microsoft.but we still buy their products...Dont we?
The software companies need to be responsible of t
Neither DOES Microsoft.but we still buy their products...Dont we?
The software companies need to be responsible of the software they put on in
the market...just like manufacturingso we can sue the hell of them.
Maybe, just maybe after that, they would do a lot more quality assura
hi,
some customers run R55P on ipso 4.1
that runs fine.
to get support on that you have to open a tac-case and ask for
limited availability of this combination.
I have no idea of FP3 and ipso 4.1 - but just contact nokia-support
and ask them.
for all others: if someone asks for FP3-support
nothing is perfect :) , how does works well enough to run in production
Mark Elsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry I wasnt able to examine all
"zillion" states. but i dont think CP checks all those states before releasing
code to public.
>
>
So works 'perfect' still stays undefined ?
M.
=
joe smith wrote:
> Sorry I wasnt able to examine all "zillion" states. but i dont think CP
> checks all those states before releasing code to public.
>
lately they seem to do little QA at all on their patches.
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or
Sorry I wasnt able to examine all "zillion" states. but i dont think CP checks
all those states before releasing code to public.
So works 'perfect' still stays undefined ?
M.
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to
Going back to the initial question and stepping out of the high school
teenager name calling...
I would say if it is a matter of legal liability, stick to what the
documentation says and install R61 ONLY on an IPSO version which release
notes ensure it runs over. That way if something goes wrong
Before you start name calling such as calling me an idiot, I think it is a good
idea
for you to check with Nokia R&D before you start calling people name. They
can tell you a few things that you may not know about IPSO 4.1 and NG
Feature Pack 3.
There are many times I have to do thin
Sorry I wasnt able to examine all "zillion" states. but i dont think CP checks
all those states before releasing code to public.
Mark Elsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well if it matters the EA2 code, "NGX
R62", runs perfect on IPSO 4.1 bx
> hth.
>
Define 'perfect' ; did you examine the zilli
NGX R62 runs great on IPSO 4.1 I would think so would R61. Maybe you should set
ti up in your lab play with it.
Nokia:57> show ipsrd version
Ipsrd version : ipsrd-IPSO-4.1-BUILD016-05.19.2006-23:06:58
Started at : Mon Sep 18 19:32:06 EDT 2006
Current time : Thu Sep 21 14:05:55 EDT 2006
Well if it matters the EA2 code, "NGX R62", runs perfect on IPSO 4.1 bx
hth.
cisco4ng wrote:
> All,
>
> I am not a Product Engineer but I am, unfortunately, doing this at work
> because the
> PE dude at my work place is doing stuffs that I think is wrong so here we
> go.
>
> I've
well for those of us men that dont wear skirts to work :) why wouold you make
FP3 run on IPSO 4.1, doesnt make sense. Like installing linux on a Nokia
appliance.
cisco4ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you guys seem to miss the point. It is not
a matter of whether it works. It's a
matter of supp
Who would run FP3 on 4.1, only an idiot.
cisco4ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you guys seem to miss the point. It is not
a matter of whether it works. It's a
matter of support and legal liablity. Heck, I can make NG Feature Pack 3 run on
IPSO 4.1 but it is not a support configuration Sure, I ca
you guys seem to miss the point. It is not a matter of whether it works. It's
a
matter of support and legal liablity. Heck, I can make NG Feature Pack 3 run
on
IPSO 4.1 but it is not a support configuration Sure, I can make IPSO4.1 runs
on
the Nokia IP650 but it is not a support con
Well if it matters the EA2 code, "NGX R62", runs perfect on IPSO 4.1 bx
hth.
Define 'perfect' ; did you examine the zillion states a sw product as
cp can be in ?
M.
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROT
All,
I am not a Product Engineer but I am, unfortunately, doing this at work
because the
PE dude at my work place is doing stuffs that I think is wrong so here we go.
I've been reading through Nokia IPSO 4.1 release notes, specifically IPSO 4.1
build 013, build 016 and build 019
19 matches
Mail list logo
