Re: [FW-1] MSN Messenger

2002-10-11 Thread Lars Troen
Title: MSN Messenger Well.. It works perfectly here.. One thing that we have configured in the Exchange System Admin on the Instant Messaging Settings properties,is the Firewall Topology with our internal networks etc. I don't know if this is the root of the problem, but it works here and

Re: [FW-1] MAC to IP conversion

2002-10-11 Thread Symon Thurlow
Title: Message If you are using swithces you will need to set a port monitor and configure it to recieve traffic for all the ports. I normally set this up at the install stage and inform the customer, but your managed service provider may not have done this. If this isn't the case at

Re: [FW-1] Securemote client loses connection to the site

2002-10-11 Thread Mellor, Derin
After what period of time does the connection get dropped? If it is after 1hour I would suspect IPSO flows. Upgrade IPSO to 3.5 or better... Derin -Original Message- From: Shahkamal Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 17:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FW-1]

[FW-1] Firewall log not switching...

2002-10-11 Thread Neville Gordon
Good Day All, I have configured my firewall log manager to start a new log every night at midnight. It was working fine for awhile and then it stopped. The appropriate configuration is there and i have pushed the rules serveral times but no luck. I am using solaris 7 and NG FP2Can anyone

[FW-1] defragmentation error

2002-10-11 Thread BENOIT . DEE
Dear all, I have NG FP2 cluster installed on IPSO 3.6 and following strange drops: 240891 10Oct2002 20:13:19 VPN-1 FireWall-1 eth-s1p3c0 10.255.64.245 log drop65.192.13.163 10.255.65.125 message Virtual defragmentation error: Timeout ip_id 8515 ip_len 0

Re: [FW-1] defragmentation error

2002-10-11 Thread Mark Ward
this is due to the overhead in the using the default packet size on your clients. To solve this you can either set pMTU to on or set the MTU on your clients to say 1300 bytes. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:51 PM

Re: [FW-1] Run SNMP by you guys...

2002-10-11 Thread Mellor, Derin
Title: Message Is the problem that you don't know what the trap is? and possibly why? Or is the problem that you expect both boxes to be generating these traps? For a simple test from the command line of the Nokia box you can run: snmpstatus 10.1.1.1 public You can do it of itself and

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread chiam . chor . chuah
hi, I got the same problem also, It only after I upgrade to NG FP2. Does any experience the same problem in FP3? chiam Singapore Don Leeper [EMAIL PROTECTED]11/10/2002 08:43 PM Sent by: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please respond to Mailing list for

Re: [FW-1] secureplatform fp3 upgrade gone a bit awry - helpful ideasappreciated

2002-10-11 Thread David Crowfoot
All the CPspupgrade_FP3.tgz does is upgrade the SecurePlatfrom to FP3 (the Linux OS only), none of the modules are upgraded during this process. You have to run the install for each of the modules that you have installed, i.e., SVN Foundation (must be 1st), VPN1/FW1, Performance Pack,

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Hasan, Irfan
I'm also facing the same problem when I do a tracert from priv IP. but when I do tracert from public ip there is no problem -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Fri 10/11/2002 11:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Don Leeper
I am running FP2 as well. I didn't have this problem before. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 6:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [FW-1] tracert question? hi, I got the same problem also, It only

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Don Leeper
I actually have a couple with private IP's that will work. They are redhat boxes, but I also have some that don't work. I just can't figure out what the issue is. Not one of my windows boxes will work. If someone has an idea please feel free to let us know. -Original Message- From:

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Hal Dorsman
Isn't this because of dissallowing icmp replies? Maybe someone who understands icmp better than I can explain it to us. To support this theory is the fact that unix traceroute works, which uses udp. Hal Hal Dorsman Network Administrator Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Missoula, Montana

Re: [FW-1] FP3

2002-10-11 Thread Schmahl, Rick
There's comfort in knowing I wasn't the only one with this problem! A workaround that worked for me was to remove the Automatically adjust for daylight savings time and set the time correctly. -Original Message- From: Arno Hechenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Deniz CEVIK
There was a bug in FP2 related windows traceroute. Also Checkpoint has released hotfix named SHF_FW1_FP2_0058.w2k.zip. May be your problem is related with this issue. -Original Message- From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Brandstaetter, Sigi
Title: Message This is because if the difference between the windows and the unix traceroute.. If you try the same from an unix machine it will work fine... unix traceroute is udp based... this problem is fixed in NG FP3 cheers Sigi -Original Message-From: Don Leeper

[FW-1] SPAM MAIL

2002-10-11 Thread Christopher Collins
Hello all, We do not yet have an anti-SPAM relay within our environment. We see a lot of mail coming in that is sourced from the person it is destined to. With Outlook messing with the header information, we don't get a good sense of where it originated but my question is this: How would you

Re: [FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Crist Clark
Hal Dorsman wrote: Isn't this because of dissallowing icmp replies? Maybe someone who understands icmp better than I can explain it to us. To support this theory is the fact that unix traceroute works, which uses udp. But the responses are still ICMP lifetime exceeded no matter whether

Re: [FW-1] SecurePlatform

2002-10-11 Thread Graham Schofield
How did you overcome it? Reginaldo Moreno wrote: Yes, but others servers. - Original Message - From: "Graham Schofield" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:54 PM Subject: [FW-1] SecurePlatform Has anyone experianced problems

[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] FP3

2002-10-11 Thread Arno Hechenberger
Hi ! I have a NG FP3 on Windows2000 Adv Server and noticed the same problem ! I am located in AUSTRIA. So I thought the reason is GMT +1. But in this case I think this is a bug ! Arno Hechenberger citydata -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Schmahl, Rick

[FW-1]

2002-10-11 Thread Sanket Pattekar
Hi I am having problems setting VPN-1 SecuClient NG to connect VPN 1/ FW1 gateway. I have configured the gateway as follows 1. A workstation object represents the machine where the gateway is installed. VPN is configured for IKE with 3-des for key exchange, MD5 for data integrity, and pre-shared

[FW-1] tracert question?

2002-10-11 Thread Don Leeper
Can someone tell me why, when I do a tracert I get request timed out but when I get to the address it comes back. My internals are nated to the fw external ip. I allow my pc anywhere. What is the issue with this. I copied what I see down below. Thanks in advance. Tracing route to

Re: [FW-1]

2002-10-11 Thread Morten Jensen
Title: RE: [FW-1] Hi Sanket This is just a list you might want to check before anything else... 1. Make sure you have the license for Secure remote installed. 2. Make sure your network object for your firewall has the VPN enabled domain exported for Secure remote (checkbox) and of course in

Re: [FW-1]

2002-10-11 Thread Ian Gilfillan
Hi, This is how I did it, 1.In the gatway object properties / VPN make sure exportable for secure remote is ticked. 2.Create a rule which says: secureremote@anyDestination Network Any Client Encrypt LongGateway 3.In Client Encrypt properties make sure source and

[FW-1] Adding customer in Provider-1 NG FP2 timed out

2002-10-11 Thread Torkel Mathisen
I tried to add a customer in Provider-1 NG FP2 today, but it timed out. When I tried to add it again, it said that the object was already defined. I managed to fix it by deleting the customer in customer.C file, but I was just wondering why this is happening? Regards, Torkel

Re: [FW-1] Connection contains real IP address of NAT'ed IP

2002-10-11 Thread Neil De La Cruz, CISSP
One of my customers is experiencing the same error message on a simpler configuration when the OWA box on the DMZ tries to authenticate with the internal PDC. This has been working fine, and no changes have been made. The log entries look like this: action-ACCEPT, service-NBDATAGRAM, source-OWA,

Re: [FW-1] Connection contains real IP address of NAT'ed IP

2002-10-11 Thread Symon Thurlow
Not sure if you read my saga earlier, but WIN2K looks like a dodgy platform for NG. I went to NT 4.0 FP3 and everything works as it should. Symon -Original Message- From: Neil De La Cruz, CISSP [mailto:neil;APPLIEDNETSYS.COM] Sent: 11 October 2002 21:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: [FW-1] FP2 client auth ssl

2002-10-11 Thread Grabowski, David
Title: RE: [FW-1] FP2 client auth ssl A hotfix was recently released to address this issue. Contact your support provider to get it. Alternatively, I have been told by one source that this is fixed in the current FP3 binaries (at least for IPSO) -Original Message- From:

[FW-1] How to set IKE and IPsec SA lifetime values on CP 4.0.

2002-10-11 Thread Lien, Alex
Hi, I am configuring a VPN link between a Checkpoint 4.0 on Nokia IP330 and a Cisco 2621 VPN router. When configuring ISAKMP encryption parameters on Checkpoint 4.0 gateway, I couldn't find where to set the IKE SA lifetime and IPsec SA lifetime values. Can someone tell me how to find out what

Re: [FW-1] MAC to IP conversion

2002-10-11 Thread Michael Perbix
If you are using DHCP, the MAC address is the unique identifier unless you are using DHCP client ID's (which generate a seperate hex code for unique ID)...scan through your DHCP logs for the MAC.. Sometimes you need to look at the easy answers 8-) -Mike On Friday, October 11, 2002, at