Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
We block mail relaying at our SMTP gateway. So does having fw-1 check the
destination domain have any value-added features? Is it another layer of
defence
Hello,
of course you can configure your Check Point FireWall as MTA. DNS does not
handle this issues (SPAM), professional MTAs like MIMESweeper, sendmail or
qMail behind your firewall do. I.e. in sendmail you just have to enter
OURDOMAIN into the acces.db.
I personally prefer having a single
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
Hello,
of course you can configure your Check Point FireWall as MTA. DNS does not
handle this issues (SPAM), professional MTAs like MIMESweeper, sendmail or
qMail behind your firewall do. I.e. in sendmail you
in the process you
drop it, the less resources you will use.
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Fritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 31, 2003 6:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
Hello,
of course you can configure
Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Januar 2003 15:40
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP Rule - 4.1 and NG FP3
We block mail relaying at our SMTP gateway. So does having fw-1 check the
destination domain have any value-added features? Is it another layer
