Hi everybody,
I think I am not the only one who is dying to get his hands on a new
release. I guess there might also be some people in this mailing list
who would like to help but are not quite sure in which area their help
is needed.
The issue tracker for release 0.6.0 currently shows 63
Hi,
I'm trying out my code under the new MVC component and I noticed there
is a problem when I use $request-setBaseUrl('http://myapp');. The
routing falls back to index/index. However if I let the request object
figure it out by itself it work well.
I found out with a bit of digging that
Arnaud Limbourg wrote:
I'm trying out my code under the new MVC component and I noticed there
is a problem when I use $request-setBaseUrl('http://myapp');. The
routing falls back to index/index. However if I let the request object
figure it out by itself it work well.
You should be using a
-- Martel Valgoerad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Wednesday, 29 November 2006, 11:26 AM +0100):
Arnaud Limbourg wrote:
I'm trying out my code under the new MVC component and I noticed there
is a problem when I use $request- setBaseUrl('http://myapp');. The
routing falls back to index/index.
Unfortunately this one is also outdated! Zend_Controller_Front
isn't singleton any more. this means you can't call getInstance() on it.
I'm still looking for an easy, good and router supported way for URL
creation.
Any ideas?
daniel
Cameron Brunner schrieb:
The current url helper in the
Zend_Controller_Front is back as a singleton in SVN...
/asger
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Daniel Kipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. november 2006 13:41
Til: Cameron Brunner; Zend Framework
Emne: Re: [fw-general] url generation
Unfortunately this one is also outdated!
Yes you can! You may need to update your copy from SVN, but Matthew
re-introduced it.
It still works pretty well.
Cheers
Unfortunately this one is also outdated! Zend_Controller_Front
isn't singleton any more. this means you can't call getInstance()
on it.
I'm still looking for an easy,
Daniel Kipp wrote:
Unfortunately this one is also outdated! Zend_Controller_Front
isn't singleton any more. this means you can't call getInstance() on it.
But it is. The change was reverted some time ago. Please update your sources.
I'm still looking for an easy, good and router supported
Hello Richard,
Any status updates on this issue?
cheers
Johannes
Richard Thomas wrote:
The box is up and running but non-responsive, I have contacted a
couple people to make sure they know.
Richard Thomas - Code Monkey
Cyberlot Technologies Group Inc.
507.398.4124 - Voice
Thomas Weidner
Any status updates on this issue?
Just log in...
works again since yesterday.
Greetings
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
But the jabber-server is down? Or maybe i should re-register?
(I can't connect.)
Johannes
Thomas Weidner wrote:
Any status updates on this issue?
Just log in... works again since yesterday.
Greetings
Thomas
But the jabber-server is down? Or maybe i should re-register?
All ok... 5 people in room...
try to connect with another user (dontknowmypwd or something).
When still having problems just look at wiki for trouble shooting.
Greetings
Thomas
RewriteEngine on
RewriteOptions Inherit
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteRule !\.(js|ico|gif|jpg|png|css)$ index.php
The above works in .htaccess but not in my httpd.conf, I get a 400 bad
request error
any ideas?
Richard Thomas -
Hi Andries,
I think the new ZFDEV home page design is a great improvement. Your
suggestion about internal wiki structure are good, but I don't think we
need to wait for that to apply the proposed changes to the home page.
Would you like to do this?
Regards,
Bill Karwin
Andries Seutens
Hi Zend Framework Community,
Zend Framework has been picking up its pace of development recently.
Many great improvements are coming soon in areas such as MVC, Acl,
Authentication, Session handling, Search engine, and Gdata. There is
also some great work in progress for Locale, Date, and
I currently run my personal site through a shared hosting plan, but
notice that the response times are slow. I understand some work has
been done to improve the framework, but I'm curious if we could
publish some steps to optimize further.
The first request to my site (tends to be low traffic)
David Rinaldi wrote:
The issue is in the first request (subsequent requests draw from files
already in server memory and response times are far more acceptable,
normally 1 sec).
I'm seeing this on my development machine too. A dead simple app's
first page load is really slow and then all the
6 seconds was probably a bit extreme, but it obviously took far too
long for real usability.
I agree that the framework shouldn't use __autoload by default. If it
turns out to be a faster method to include only the necessary files, I
think at least documentation should be updated to state what
18 matches
Mail list logo