[fw-general] noRouteAction ....no function ...please help

2006-12-20 Thread andreencinas
hello noRouteAction the indexController not function please help -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/noRouteAction-no-function-...please-help-tf2863934s16154.html#a8003340 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: [fw-general] Zend_Registry needs its set() and has() methods back

2006-12-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
offset* are the names used for overloading OO syntax. So $obj->prop, $obj->prop = 5 and isset($obj->prop) should all work nicely. Don't you prefer that syntax? Andi > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Ratzloff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 3:34 PM > To:

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Registry needs its set() and has() methods back

2006-12-20 Thread Matthew Ratzloff
Gavin, Thanks for the updated documentation. I gotta say, though, that offsetSet(), offsetGet(), and offsetExists() aren't nearly as intuitive and easy to remember as the standard set(), get(), and has() methods of a container object. FWIW, I think they're poorly named in the SPL class to begin

[fw-general] Thoughts on an Ajax component

2006-12-20 Thread Matthew Ratzloff
I occasionally see people on message boards, in blog comments, and (although not lately) on this mailing list asking why Zend Framework doesn't have an Ajax component, so I've written up a quick blog post with my thoughts on the subject. Thought I'd share with any who were interested. http://www.

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene questions

2006-12-20 Thread Sebi
Thank you for your great and detailed explanation. You were very explicit I have one little question yet. You said "Do you have any idea about terms selectivity?" What means terms selectivity? > --> > >> I have some questions related to the Zend Framework Search Lucene. I > >> want to implemen

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Registry needs its set() and has() methods back

2006-12-20 Thread Gavin Vess
Thanks Matthew for raising this issue. I've made a couple changes, and improved the documentation: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/Wy8 http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/pageinfo.action?pageId=12124 I believe the new code examples show how to pass around a registry object explicitly, and t

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene field boost

2006-12-20 Thread Alexander Veremyev
Sebi wrote: > >Index stores "normalization factor" for each field of each document. >This normalization factor depends on document and field boost factors >and number of terms within the field. >Take a look on >http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.search.extending.html#zend.search.exten

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene field boost

2006-12-20 Thread Sebi
Thank you for your answer. >> I want to create an index where words in "title" field will have bigger >> weight that those in "description" field. i see there si a field >> variable called boost. I tried to set that variable to a bigger value >> (let's say 100), but useless. After I added the

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene field boost

2006-12-20 Thread Alexander Veremyev
Sebi wrote: I want to create an index where words in "title" field will have bigger weight that those in "description" field. i see there si a field variable called boost. I tried to set that variable to a bigger value (let's say 100), but useless. After I added the field to the document and t

Re: [fw-general] Error in dispatching with 'useModules' => true

2006-12-20 Thread Michael Depetrillo
Hello I have run into this same issue and am not sure what to do. I am using the latest version from svn 2443. *Fatal error*: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in * /home/mike/workspace/domain.com/Zend-6.0 /library/Zend/Controller/Dispatcher.php* on line *566 *The problem begins in

Re: [fw-general] 0.2.0 Migration docs...

2006-12-20 Thread Kevin McArthur
That did the trick! -- thanks.. Might add this to the 0.2.0 migration docs! Kevin - Original Message - From: "Martel Valgoerad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [fw-general] 0.2.0 Migration docs... Kevin McArthur wrote: Uncaught exce

Re: [fw-general] 0.2.0 Migration docs...

2006-12-20 Thread Martel Valgoerad
Kevin McArthur wrote: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Controller_Exception' with message 'CatalogController::60221Action() does not exist and was not trapped in __call()' It haven't mached your route and probably hit the default one instead. Your route definition looks ok, so there must be some oth

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene questions

2006-12-20 Thread Alexander Veremyev
Hi! Sebi wrote: --> >> I have some questions related to the Zend Framework Search Lucene. I >> want to implement a fast and scalable directory system and I need to >> understand some things. >Sounds very interesting! >> 1. I read that |Zend_Search_Lucene::optimize()function merges all

[fw-general] 0.2.0 Migration docs...

2006-12-20 Thread Kevin McArthur
Has the method of passing controller and action overrides to a Zend_Controller_Router_Route changed for 0.6.0? The migrations state that it should work ask before but it doesn't. $router = new Zend_Controller_RewriteRouter(); $router->addRoute('catalog', new Zend_Controller_Router_Route('catalo

[fw-general] Zend_Registry needs its set() and has() methods back

2006-12-20 Thread Matthew Ratzloff
Was it an oversight that Zend_Registry lost its set() and has() methods when it was refactored to extend ArrayObject, despite still having a corresponding get() method? I don't know about everyone else, but I prefer to pass around a registry object explicitly rather than rely on the static Zend::r

Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene questions

2006-12-20 Thread Sebi
Sorry for sending this email again. I thought that I didn't send the last one in a proper way. Thank you for your answer. >> want to implement a fast and scalable directory system and I need to >> understand some things. >Sounds very interesting! >> 1. I read that |Zend_Search_Lucene::optim

[fw-general] Zend_Search_Lucene field boost

2006-12-20 Thread Sebi
I want to create an index where words in "title" field will have bigger weight that those in "description" field. i see there si a field variable called boost. I tried to set that variable to a bigger value (let's say 100), but useless. After I added the field to the document and the document to