Yup, I'm a fool! I looked those over probably a dozen times and didn't see
anything wrong with them. Guess I'd been working too long.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> -- Lyle Underwood wrote
> (on Friday, 03 September 2010, 05:19 PM -0700):
> > As far as I can tel
Hi Carlos,
Your account was marked "in-active". This happens sometimes and I am
unsure what causes it. In any case, I've marked it as "active" again,
please try to see if it works for you-
-ralph
On 9/7/10 1:05 AM, Carlos Medina wrote:
Hi Matthew,
the i have reset my password three times
-- Lyle Underwood wrote
(on Tuesday, 07 September 2010, 10:01 AM -0700):
> Yup, I'm a fool! I looked those over probably a dozen times and didn't see
> anything wrong with them. Guess I'd been working too long.
Not a fool at all -- sometimes we all get too close to the problem, and
can't see the
RE Matthew, (and list)
One more question if I may.
Rather than verifying the token at the method level what do you think
about verifying the token in the request constructor?
What I mean is that for each server method that you want "protected"
you would have to verify the token in the method body
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Latter
Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Subject: Zend_XmlRpc token passing
To: "fw-general@lists.zend.com"
RE Matthew, (and list)
One more question if I may.
Rather than verifying the token at the method level what do you think
about verifyi
RE Matthew, (and list)
One more question if I may.
Rather than verifying the token at the method level what do you think
about verifying the token in the request constructor?
What I mean is that for each server method that you want "protected"
you would have to verify the token in the method bod
-- Daniel Latter wrote
(on Tuesday, 07 September 2010, 08:39 PM +0100):
> One more question if I may.
> Rather than verifying the token at the method level what do you think
> about verifying the token in the request constructor?
>
> What I mean is that for each server method that you want "prote
Thanks Matthew I'll digest this fully tommorow but just wanted to
appologise as I sent this message a few times from a different email,
so sorry to the list for that.
Thanks again Matthew for your thoughts, they help a lot.
Daniel.
On 7 Sep 2010, at 21:16, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
If anyone can provide more on this issue, which I'm also dealing with in a
Solaris environment, I would greatly appreciate it. We have multiple
Solaris servers and supposedly libiconv is installed consistently on all of
them; the iconv settings reported by PHP are consistent among servers; but
th