Wil Moore III wrote:
> I can say that for my current applications Doctrine2 is proving to be
> production ready right now.
>
I second that sentiment.
--
View this message in context:
http://zend-framework-community.634137.n4.nabble.com/ZF-2-0-when-and-what-tp3031964p3043223.html
Sent from the
I've asked the same thing before. I reported the issue, but was told either
choose all MCV routes or none. Hopefully this can be "fixed" in ZF2 as I
still think it an open issue, and one that could (somewhat) easily be
solved.
http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-7746
--
View this messag
pwansch wrote:
> Has anybody successfully implemented Facebook Connect all the way
> including logout?
>
Just curious, but why are you wanting users to logout of your system? I
thought one of the key features of FB Connect was that if they were logged
in to FB, then they were automatically log
Hector Virgen wrote:
>
> Are you concerned with the result of Doctrine's flush?
>
Yes and no. The only reason I was looking to have it in a single place was
so that the flush could cover the entire Unit Of Work (and it also makes it
somewhat "set it and forget it"). However, since there were
I'm wanting to do some cleanup commands (ex. issue Doctrine "flush") after
all activity has completed (ie. no more [state] changes).
Where is the most logical place to issue that command?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Where-to-issue-final-common-logic-tp1788759p
Thanks! I was thinking it converted the object passed to the partial into an
array as well (don't know where that came from, oh well). It is working
perfectly now.
Just FYI, it was a series of mistakes that didn't allow me to figure this
out on my own. First, I wasn't echoing what the partial
Jurian Sluiman wrote:
>
> My problem is *many* data is loaded. Besides acl, auth and i18n also
> containers at the page with "latest blog posts", "last tweet", "recent
> pictures" etc. Therefore I thought let's cache everything! :p
>
I think that the point Giorgio was trying to make was the o
Ok, so you can't pass objects to partials (unless they can be converted to an
array). So, what alternatives do you have/suggest for being able to pass
objects (in this case Doctrine Entities/Models) to something like a partial
so that you can add markup to a .phtml file?
I guess what I'm wanting
Haha, well thanks for pointing out the obvious!
This actually started when I was doing the following in my view
topics as $topic): ?>
And I was getting duplicates, so I started backtracking through the
different levels (controller, service, etc) and was hoping it wasn't some
obscure bug I'd
I have the following in my service layer:
public function findAll()
{
$q = $this->_em->createQuery('select t from PT_Model_Topic t');
$topics = $q->getResult();
die(Zend_Debug::dump($topics));
//die('' . print_r($topics,true) . '');
return $topics;
Chris Morrell-2 wrote:
>
> Right now I treat my models as resources with a special exception for the
> user model which is both a resource and a role. Then I actually make the
> models responsible for managing their own ACL permissions, both setting
> them
> up and querying them. To facilitate
Just add the following to your configs/application.ini
resources.layout.layoutPath = APPLICATION_PATH "/layouts/scripts/"
Those options are just shortcuts/helpers for automating some tasks. You can
do everything manually if you want.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Is-zf-
Jake McGraw wrote:
>
> At my company (http://www.targetspot.com) we did something really
> radical and used our company name:
>
> "Targetspot_"
>
> Crazy, I know.
>
You sir, are a rebel.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Naming-your-Namespace-tp1692481p1692803.html
Sent
Hector Virgen wrote:
>
> A related question: in a multiple-module ZF app, is your main module named
> "default" while all of the other modules have names specific to what they
> are for, or do you rename the default module to something else?
>
I've ended up keeping it just for simplicity sake.
I'm trying to figure out what "layer(s)" should implement which aspect(s) of
Zend_Acl. So I've got a few questions.
Are the models the resources (ie. implements Zend_Acl_Resource_Interface) or
does that belong solely in the service layer? I could see a case being made
for the service class impl
Just curious, but do most people namespace their code according to their
project or do you just use something generic say "App"?
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Naming-your-Namespace-tp1692481p1692481.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm trying to wrap my brain around some of these concepts as well. Just out
of curiosity, who all uses module specific models?
In the case of dasprids.de (source: http://site.svn.dasprids.de/) Ben
separates the models into their respective module utilizing the "default"
module somewhat as a comm
17 matches
Mail list logo
