Re: [fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-26 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Jeroen Keppens wrote (on Tuesday, 26 May 2009, 07:15 AM -0700): > keith Pope-4 wrote: > > 2009/5/8 Rick Buitenman : > > ... > > Yes, the module bootstrap resource will loop and call each module > > bootstrap, though it skips the default module. > > ... > > Is there a specific reason for this?

Re: [fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-26 Thread Jeroen Keppens
keith Pope-4 wrote: > > 2009/5/8 Rick Buitenman : > ... > Yes, the module bootstrap resource will loop and call each module > bootstrap, though it skips the default module. > ... > Is there a specific reason for this? You can of course say that the main bootstrap should contain the default be

Re: [fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-08 Thread Ralph Schindler
Or am I completely missing the point of Zend_Application and is there already a better way of doing this? You already identified the way to do this: controller plugins. Matthew is right, controller plugins are the ideal way to hook into the dispatch cycle with runtime logic. Another con

Re: [fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-08 Thread Rick Buitenman
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: [...] Which is something I currently do via a Controller plugin, not a solution I'm particularly happy with. Although Zend_Application does inspire a more elegant, reusable way of implementing this, it would be great to have a similar "standard" solution, a so

Re: [fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-08 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Rick Buitenman wrote (on Friday, 08 May 2009, 09:15 AM +0200): > On May 8, 2009, at 8:07 AM, keith Pope wrote: > > 2009/5/8 Rick Buitenman : > > > There are a number of threads on bootstrapping modules, but I > > > think it might help to isolate what seems to be a reoccuring > > > source of c

Re: [fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-08 Thread Rick Buitenman
On May 8, 2009, at 8:07 AM, keith Pope wrote: 2009/5/8 Rick Buitenman : Hi, There are a number of threads on bootstrapping modules, but I think it might help to isolate what seems to be a reoccuring source of confusion (at least it is for me): Am I right in assuming that *all* bootstrap

Re: [fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-07 Thread keith Pope
2009/5/8 Rick Buitenman : > Hi, > > There are a number of threads on bootstrapping modules, but I think it might > help to isolate what seems to be a reoccuring source of confusion (at least > it is for me): > > Am I right in assuming that *all* bootstraps of all modules are executed > regardless f

[fw-general] A question about bootstrapping modules

2009-05-07 Thread Rick Buitenman
Hi, There are a number of threads on bootstrapping modules, but I think it might help to isolate what seems to be a reoccuring source of confusion (at least it is for me): Am I right in assuming that *all* bootstraps of all modules are executed regardless for which module the request is?