Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-26 Thread Brenton Alker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vince42 wrote: > That's exactly why I am currently trying to port the guestbook example > to a modularized version - maybe I'll post about it, when it's done. :) Sounds like a good idea :) I've posted about how I modularized the guestbook application

Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-26 Thread keith Pope
2009/6/26 Vince42 : > Hi, > > swilhelm schrieb: >> I agree, modules (and auth and acl) should be added to the QuickStart >> or some other Zend provided example. I can't think of any real world >> application that will not need these three additional capabilities. > > That's exactly why I am current

Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-26 Thread Vince42
Hi, swilhelm schrieb: > I agree, modules (and auth and acl) should be added to the QuickStart > or some other Zend provided example. I can't think of any real world > application that will not need these three additional capabilities. That's exactly why I am currently trying to port the guestbook

Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-26 Thread Vince42
Hi, keith Pope schrieb: > I find it best to name the default module though > like this: > > resources.frontcontroller.defaultmodule = "mynamespace" > resources.frontcontroller.params.prefixDefaultModule = true > > and then use: > > $this->_resourceLoader = new Zend_Application_Module_Autoloader

Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-26 Thread swilhelm
I agree, modules (and auth and acl) should be added to the QuickStart or some other Zend provided example. I can't think of any real world application that will not need these three additional capabilities. - Steve W. Vince42 wrote: > > Hi, > > Dalibor Karlović schrieb: >> I think we should r

Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-25 Thread keith Pope
2009/6/25 Vince42 : > Hi, > > Dalibor Karlović schrieb: >> I think we should rethink this as it's obvious many people use the >> default module just like any other so the behavior should be as >> expected, even if adding an additional option. > > I circumvented this odd behaviour with > >   http://

Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-25 Thread Vince42
Hi, Dalibor Karlović schrieb: > I think we should rethink this as it's obvious many people use the > default module just like any other so the behavior should be as > expected, even if adding an additional option. I circumvented this odd behaviour with http://paste2.org/p/284720 but I think

Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-25 Thread Dalibor Karlović
On Thursday 25 June 2009 23:54:41 Vince42 wrote: > Hi, > > I have two module directories: default and test. > > This is an attempt to set up a very basic module structure in order to > understand the new bootstrapping. > > In application.ini I basically do > > resources.frontController.moduleDirect

[fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models

2009-06-25 Thread Vince42
Hi, I have two module directories: default and test. This is an attempt to set up a very basic module structure in order to understand the new bootstrapping. In application.ini I basically do resources.frontController.moduleDirectory = APPLICATION_PATH "/modules" resources.modules[] = which wo