Re: [fw-general] Issue Tracking now moved to GitHub

2012-10-10 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Andreas Möller wrote (on Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 10:14 PM +0200): > > > Zend Framework 2 has officially cut over our issue tracking needs to > > GitHub in accordance with the proposal approved 2 weeks ago. > > > > We've also ported all open issues to the GH issue tracker, and > > labeled

Re: [fw-general] Issue Tracking now moved to GitHub

2012-10-10 Thread Andreas Möller
> Zend Framework 2 has officially cut over our issue tracking needs to GitHub > in accordance with the proposal approved 2 weeks ago. > > We've also ported all open issues to the GH issue tracker, and labeled them > as best we could (including tagging as many usernames we could logically > fin

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Issue Tracking now moved to GitHub

2012-10-01 Thread Robert Basic
On 1 October 2012 16:13, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > -- Robert Basic wrote > (on Sunday, 30 September 2012, 10:04 AM +0200): >> Just want to ask where are documentation issues reported? Because the >> code and the documentation are in separate repos, yet the >> documentation repo doesn't hav

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Issue Tracking now moved to GitHub

2012-10-01 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Robert Basic wrote (on Sunday, 30 September 2012, 10:04 AM +0200): > Just want to ask where are documentation issues reported? Because the > code and the documentation are in separate repos, yet the > documentation repo doesn't have the issues enabled? Actually, that was on oversight. I've jus

[fw-general] Issue Tracking now moved to GitHub

2012-09-28 Thread Ralph Schindler
Hey Everyone, Zend Framework 2 has officially cut over our issue tracking needs to GitHub in accordance with the proposal approved 2 weeks ago. We've also ported all open issues to the GH issue tracker, and labeled them as best we could (including tagging as many usernames we could logically