Hi Paul,
I stand corrected, you pointed out a very valid reason for comparing
execution times of "hello world" in plain-php and ZF. Reading Endijs'
question again, I see that's exactly what he asked for.
It's just that I have also read mails on this ML from people who
compared plain to ZF-"hello
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Tobias Gies wrote:
> Endijs,
>
> (a dedicated server is a must!)
Whether hardware or a VM.
--
A.J. Brown
web | http://ajbrown.org
phone | (937) 660-3969
Good point (to benchmark against phpBB, Wordpress etc. not against plain php
file)! I will do so.
Thanks for reply!
P.S. Yes - now I see how silly my question looks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Normal-request-per-second-rate-for-ZF-application--tp22160051p22163224
Endijs,
Benchmarking a plain-php "hello world" file against the same stuff
implemented in ZF just doesn't make any sense. If you only want to
display "hello world", you don't need ZF. If you want to benchmark,
you always have to benchmark your use-case against a real-world
application that does ro
Hi!
I just installed Zend Server CE and there is a benchmark tool. I want to ask
- how big "requests per second" rate is considered good for applications
built on top of Zend Framework. I know - that depends on hardware,
application it self etc. But I'm more interested in comparison with plain
PH