Re: [fw-general] Re: [fw-db] Zend_Db_Table concrete instantiation

2009-07-16 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Mon Zafra wrote (on Thursday, 16 July 2009, 11:35 AM +0800): > That's neat. I've always wondered why Zend_Db_Table is an abstract class > extending another abstract class while not adding any new methods. Originally, Zend_Db_Table was abstract itself. At some point, we started using the naming

[fw-general] Re: [fw-db] Zend_Db_Table concrete instantiation

2009-07-15 Thread Mon Zafra
That's neat. I've always wondered why Zend_Db_Table is an abstract class extending another abstract class while not adding any new methods. -- Mon On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ralph Schindler wrote: > Hello all! > > I have commited to trunk a new feature for Zend_Db_Table that will be in

[fw-general] Re: [fw-db] Zend_Db_Table

2006-10-12 Thread Simon Mundy
On 13/10/2006, at 7:42 AM, Abu Hurayrah (FW) wrote: Ooohthis is looking good (after reading the explanation here: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFMLGEN/mail/1625). I would really like to see this going hand-in-hand with my previous proposal of making Zend_Db_Table_Rows