Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-02-01 Thread David Mintz
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Hector Virgen wrote: > > Damn. As a high-level userland freeloader I have been loving the > convenience > > of doing what seems kind of like time travel -- > > $this->JQuery()->onLoadCaptureStart() -- in my views. I wonder how you > might > > hack up something equ

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-31 Thread Hector Virgen
> Damn. As a high-level userland freeloader I have been loving the convenience > of doing what seems kind of like time travel -- > $this->JQuery()->onLoadCaptureStart() -- in my views. I wonder how you might > hack up something equivalent in ZF 2.0. I use this: jQuery(function($){ // js code

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-31 Thread David Mintz
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > -- David Mintz wrote > (on Monday, 31 January 2011, 03:37 PM -0500): > > A naive question: even if ZendX JQuery is dropped as of ZF 2.0, if you > > wanted to migrate to 2.0 *and* keep ZendX JQuery, is there any reason why > > you c

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-31 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- David Mintz wrote (on Monday, 31 January 2011, 03:37 PM -0500): > A naive question: even if ZendX JQuery is dropped as of ZF 2.0, if you > wanted to migrate to 2.0 *and* keep ZendX JQuery, is there any reason why > you couldn't install it and use like any other 3rd party or home-grown > plugin?

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-31 Thread David Mintz
A naive question: even if ZendX JQuery is dropped as of ZF 2.0, if you wanted to migrate to 2.0 *and* keep ZendX JQuery, is there any reason why you couldn't install it and use like any other 3rd party or home-grown plugin? -- David Mintz http://davidmintz.org/ It ain't over: http://www.healthcar

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-19 Thread Jigal sanders
Hello, After having followed a good extensive tutorial about jQuery ( http://www.bennadel.com/resources/presentations/jquery/video/index.htm) I think i understand where you guys come from. But I ZendX_Jquery will not be supported as if version 2.0 what is the suggested way to implement jQuery code

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-19 Thread Jigal sanders
Hello, After having followed a good extensive tutorial about jQuery ( http://www.bennadel.com/resources/presentations/jquery/video/index.htm) I think i understand where you guys come from. But I ZendX_Jquery will not be supported as if version 2.0 what is the suggested way to implement jQuery code

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-19 Thread Dennis Winter
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:31, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > Well bad-practice is the fact that currently each form element generates > its own javascript code. > > If there were a bunch of zf jQuery plugins that are integrated and those > are used through classes then the extension might be more helpfu

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-19 Thread Benjamin Eberlei
Well bad-practice is the fact that currently each form element generates its own javascript code. If there were a bunch of zf jQuery plugins that are integrated and those are used through classes then the extension might be more helpful, but this requires a complete rewrite and stricter focus

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-18 Thread Aleksey Zapparov
I absolutely agree with point of Benjamin! And I can tell few reasons more why this component should be abandoned :)) 2011/1/17 Phil Brown : > Never used ZendX_Jquery for the exact reasons Benjamin's stated as reasons > to abandon it, so that's an "aye" vote from me. > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Phil Brown
Never used ZendX_Jquery for the exact reasons Benjamin's stated as reasons to abandon it, so that's an "aye" vote from me. On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > Hello everyone, > > 2 years ago I was pretty sure of the Dojo and jQuery components/integration > into ZF. I have s

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Guy Halford-Thompson
I agree with this. For any application that requires more than a few lines of JavaScript, the JS should be kept in separate 'javascript' files. On 17 Jan 2011, at 18:47, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > Hello everyone, > > 2 years ago I was pretty sure of the Dojo and jQuery components/integration

Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Jigal sanders
Please don't discontinue support for jQuery/ I think there are many people who use it On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Dolf Schimmel wrote: > I agree with Benjamin here. Though I think that the Zend_Dojo allows > for more extensibility than Zendx_Jquery. > > However, if we decide to drop ZendX_Jq

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Paul Boivin
Agree with both Dolf and Benjamin. On 17 January 2011 13:50, Dolf Schimmel wrote: > I agree with Benjamin here. Though I think that the Zend_Dojo allows > for more extensibility than Zendx_Jquery. > > However, if we decide to drop ZendX_Jquery (if not, who'll maintain > it?), I think we at least

[fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Discontinuing Maintenance of ZendX JQuery - Suggest drop for 2.0

2011-01-17 Thread Dolf Schimmel
I agree with Benjamin here. Though I think that the Zend_Dojo allows for more extensibility than Zendx_Jquery. However, if we decide to drop ZendX_Jquery (if not, who'll maintain it?), I think we at least should write some decent documentation on how one should decently implement Js with ZF. Dolf