Great. I'll take a look. If you have some time and would like to contribute,
provide feedback, etc please take a look at the github.com/mlurz71.
Thanks for you interest.
Exception e wrote:
>
> hey, count me in!
>
> I would like to point out that that there is already a doctrine-firebug
> plug
hey, count me in!
I would like to point out that that there is already a doctrine-firebug
plugin for zf: http://taat.pl/article/zend_framework_tutorial/step5/.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-ZendX_Doctrine-tp23454552p25476504.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mail
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your interest.
Overall I've been unable to drum up a lot of community involvement but
that's to be expected at this stage I think.
In the meantime, I have submitted a few proposals, but an focusing on the
resource plugin proposal. I'd really like to get other developers on b
What is the current status of this?
-Matt
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Matthew Lurz wrote:
>
> I agree, with both of you :) I don't think we need to swallow the project
> whole or cultivate an overarching bureaucracy since the ZF team provides
> the
> necessary tooling, processes, etc
>
> At
I agree, with both of you :) I don't think we need to swallow the project
whole or cultivate an overarching bureaucracy since the ZF team provides the
necessary tooling, processes, etc
At the same time, I think that a small group of us could put out a
substantial chunk and that the quality of tha
Matthew Lurz wrote:
>
> Thanks. Eventually proposals will need to be create and submitted. I think
> we need to address some big-picture questions before getting into the
> details of any given component.
>
>
> admirau wrote:
>>
>> Take a look on my approach:
>> http://wiki.github.com/taat/m
I suggest we simply start by rolling out functionality that already exists
in the framework (adapters and such), and then roll out new features from
there, things that don't even exist in the framework itself, like an acl
with db.
Jason
On May 12, 2009 2:14pm, Josh Team wrote:
I persona
I personally think we are putting the horse before the cart. This
doesn't have to be one huge project.. If we have any type of review
processes, which we will in being an Open Source community, we can
break down the project into smaller independent integration points.
(e.g. Zend Acl w/ Doctrine - D
Yeah, this is more or less what you'd need to implement.
Off the top of your head, can you think of what "development time" tasks
should be exposed? What will the tool be doing for the developer?
-ralph
Matthew Lurz wrote:
I think a Zend Tool Project Provider is what I may be looking for in
Thanks. Eventually proposals will need to be create and submitted. I think we
need to address some big-picture questions before getting into the details
of any given component.
For instance:
- what is the vision/goal?
- what means will we use to communicate as a group?
- what are the necessar
Jasone wrote:
>
> I am able, and have the time, to do this. I authored two of those
> proposals. Been waiting on the zend team :)
>
> (Or now that I look, maybe they're not moved to "ready for review" yet?)
>
>
> Jason
>
>
Take a look on my approach:
http://wiki.github.com/taat/myzend
-
Thanks Jason. I watch Jani's blog and so read his post some time ago, but
need to read it again.
Jasone wrote:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/zfsecurity/source/browse/trunk/demo/application/library/App/Form/Doctrine.php
>
> I've got one too :)
>
> Jani also has one here somewhere: http://codeu
http://code.google.com/p/zfsecurity/source/browse/trunk/demo/application/library/App/Form/Doctrine.php
I've got one too :)
Jani also has one here somewhere: http://codeutopia.net/blog/
Jason
On May 9, 2009 8:10am, Giorgio Sironi
wrote:
2009/5/9 Matthew Lurz mlur...@gmail.com>
The form
2009/5/9 Matthew Lurz
> The form generator component will likely be one of the most complex since
> it
> will likely require the most flexibility. At least I imagine the potential
> use case scenarios to be varied. I'd be interested in taking a look at how
> you're handling this.
>
See my Ossige
Thanks for the feedback Giorgio.
I whipped together a resource plugin for exploratory purposes. It needs
work, but if you're curious take a look at http://pastie.org/472198 and
http://pastie.org/472205.
I haven't yet played with module bootstraps, but this should work for
modular apps as well.
2009/5/9 Matthew Lurz
> ZendX_Doctrine_Application_Resource_Manager (2)
>
This would be interesting, generated/ folders and manage modules is
difficult at the moment.
ZendX_Doctrine_CodeGenerator_Form (3)
I have taken the other approach: a Zend_Form subclass that generates fields
and select a
I think a Zend Tool Project Provider is what I may be looking for instead.
Matthew Lurz wrote:
>
> Thanks Josh. I hadn't thought of those and that's exactly the kind of
> input needed to get a handle on the potential scope.
>
>
> Josh Team wrote:
>>
>> I'm an avid user of both ZF and Doctrin
Anyone have any idea as to where to start with a Zend_Tool_Client? It seems
like that's what would be needed to tie in Doctrine_Cli/Doctrine_Task to
Zend_Tool. From the
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.tool.framework.architecture.html#zend.tool.framework.architecture.clients
docs :
It wo
Thanks Josh. I hadn't thought of those and that's exactly the kind of input
needed to get a handle on the potential scope.
Josh Team wrote:
>
> I'm an avid user of both ZF and Doctrine. Time is short on my end but
> I can help here and there. Two things I've done with ZF & Doctrine is
> merge D
I'm an avid user of both ZF and Doctrine. Time is short on my end but
I can help here and there. Two things I've done with ZF & Doctrine is
merge Doctrine with Lucene Search w/ Doctrine listeners that update
the index on save/insert/delete. I've also merged Doctrine with
Zend_Amf to allow remoting
Thanks Jason!!
Clearly others, such as yourself, have exerted more effort than I in
creating proposals, etc. I only hope to help in whatever way possible. Feel
free to interject, but a tentative plan to move forward might look something
like:
1) Gather momentum and get a few dedicated people on
I am able, and have the time, to do this. I authored two of those
proposals. Been waiting on the zend team :)
(Or now that I look, maybe they're not moved to "ready for review" yet?)
Jason
On May 8, 2009 6:16pm, Matthew Lurz wrote:
!!! Calling All Doctrine/ZF Users !!!
While the ZF
22 matches
Mail list logo
