Hi,
I don't understand how this TwoLevels cache should work and I see some odd
results quick tests.
Is that it will use fast cache for untagged entries, and slow for tagged
entries? Cuz sometimes I see both entries in APC and in SQLite
Sometimes I see it only in SQLite.
With the "two lev
So, can anyone explain, confirm or deny things I wrote in my post?
ty
agatone wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm sorry for replying to older post but I need to clear some things.
>
> I don't understand how this TwoLevels cache should work and I see some odd
> results quick tests.
> Is that it will use
Hello,
I'm sorry for replying to older post but I need to clear some things.
I don't understand how this TwoLevels cache should work and I see some odd
results quick tests.
Is that it will use fast cache for untagged entries, and slow for tagged
entries? Cuz sometimes I see both entries in APC a
Oh sorry, my fault. I used Memcached as slow backend :-)
Fabien MARTY wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Jan Pieper a écrit :
>> Can you please show us an example how to realize tagged-memcache-caching
>> with
>> this new two-level backend?
>>
>
> something like that (not tested) :
>
>
> $slowBackend =
Hi,
Jan Pieper a écrit :
Can you please show us an example how to realize tagged-memcache-caching with
this new two-level backend?
something like that (not tested) :
'/tmp/'
);
$fastBackendOptions = array|(
'servers' => ||array(array('host' => 'localhost','port' => 11211,
'persistent'
Can you please show us an example how to realize tagged-memcache-caching with
this new two-level backend?
Fabien MARTY wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please have a look at the "TwoLevels" backend in 1.7 trunk (or in 1.7
> PR), it's want you want.
>
> It does exactly this.
>
> Feedback welcome
>
> Regar
Diabl0 pisze:
Ok, here you can download and test my fast implementation. It's only
example, so it still need some testing and probably improvements.
Unfortutnenty, trying to implement
Mao_Cache::CLEANING_MODE_MATCHING_ANY_TAG (in my opinion very useful
and i will submit it as suggestion for Z
