list please? :)
only IO::Socket::INET I guess...
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:58:07 -0800
Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to mention that I worked under the assumption that if I
> used any modules, they had to be part of the standard Perl distribution.
> The only thing that
Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski wrote:
list please? :)
only IO::Socket::INET I guess...
Vladi-
Here are the modules listed in Chapter 32: "Standard Modules", of
Programming Perl, 3rd ed.:
Benchmark
Carp
CGI
CGI::Carp
Class::Struct
Config
CPAN
Cwd
Data::Dumper
DB_File
Dumpvalue
English
Errno
Exporter
Right...I had a version that used crypt on the password at one point,
but then realized that was silly; it was no different than just using a
plaintext password that looked like gobbleygook.
The original python version never actually sends the password in any
form; I believe it just uses it to
On Thursday, December 16, 2004, Brad Greenlee wrote:
> The original python version never actually sends the password in any
> form; I believe it just uses it to hash the server url, which gets
> passed as a parameter. The server then just hashes its own url with its
> password to see if they matc
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:08:11AM -0800, Brad Greenlee wrote:
> That or someone with sufficient power could make Digest::MD5 or ::SHA1
> part of the standard perl distro :-).
Digest and Digest::MD5 are in 5.8.0.
On Thursday, December 16, 2004, Brad Greenlee wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to mention that I worked under the assumption that if I
> used any modules, they had to be part of the standard Perl distribution.
> The only thing that's really lacking compared to the python version is
> some kind of digest a
Doh! Somebody beat me to it. Didn't use IO::Socket either:
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/15/1953227&tid=95&tid=156&tid=1
-b
Sven Neuhaus wrote:
Can we beat them (in perl)?
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/tinyp2p.html
[ re-ordered to make sense ]
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 02:51:41PM +0200, Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:58:07 -0800
> Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, forgot to mention that I worked under the assumption that if I
> > used any modules, they had
