Here's a distillation of something that just bit me, behaves the same on
5.6.1 and 5.8.5. Observe the following program:
for (1..2) {
print_file($0);
}
for (qw(one two)) {
print_file($0);
}
sub print_file {
local @ARGV = shift;
while (<>) { print }
}
__END__
Before running it, can you
> "PS" == Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> Here's a distillation of something that just bit me, behaves the same on
PS> 5.6.1 and 5.8.5. Observe the following program:
PS> for (1..2) {
PS> print_file($0);
PS> }
PS> for (qw(one two)) {
PS> print_file($0);
PS> }
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:19:21 -0700 (PDT), John Douglas Porter wrote:
>If you really want to test the ref type, do so
>robustly using the methods in Scalar::Util.
I'm not convinced that is indeed the best approach. So Uri expects
either a plain string, or a scalar ref to a string.
What if instead
Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:19:21 -0700 (PDT), John Douglas Porter wrote:
>
> >If you really want to test the ref type, do so
> >robustly using the methods in Scalar::Util.
>
> I'm not convinced that is indeed the best approach.
> . . .
> Thus: treat only an u
