Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-11-26 Thread Robin Houston
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:03:09PM -0400, Michael J Assels wrote: > I don't have a copy, unfortunately, but I remember the author's > name: Peter Beebe. Thank goodness for the web archive! http://web.archive.org/web/19971211155944/www.perl.org/wits.html http://web.archive.org/web/19980110061045

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-11-26 Thread Scott R. Godin
In article <0b4701c128c3$a4809af0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Cotter) wrote: > From: "John W. Krahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > What animal do you want on the cover? :-) > > Jeraphs > > *groan* :-) What would the world be like today if Mr. Ed had been a Camel? =8) -- Scot

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-11-26 Thread Scott R. Godin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael J Assels) wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Are there other ways to do it with no letters? > > What about no numbers too? > > Here's one with no letters, numbers, parentheses, brackets > or braces: > > $@='@

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-19 Thread Andrew . Savige
Thanks to Lev Selector, I have extended my original ob2.pl into an "Accidental Smirch". Originally, I was just trying to make it easier to generate an obfuscated Perl program to print a simple text message to annoy my friends with. Lev asked could it be extended to convert a Perl program into an

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-19 Thread Paul Cotter
From: "John W. Krahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What animal do you want on the cover? :-) Jeraphs

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-18 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "John" == John W Krahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Next, O'Reilly will be soliciting for "JAPHs in a Nutshell"! John> What animal do you want on the cover? :-) A Party Animal, of course. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-18 Thread John W . Krahn
On Saturday 18 August 2001 08:24, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > Gawd. What have I started? > > :-) > > Next, O'Reilly will be soliciting for "JAPHs in a Nutshell"! What animal do you want on the cover? :-) -- John Wesley Krahn, CD Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-18 Thread Uri Guttman
> "RLS" == Randal L Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RLS> Next, O'Reilly will be soliciting for "JAPHs in a Nutshell"! they could make it into one of those tiny $5 desktop/pocket editions. with NO explanations. :-) uri -- Uri Guttman - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http:

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-18 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Andrew" == Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> Maybe there should be an ANSI JAPH standard. Gawd. What have I started? :-) Next, O'Reilly will be soliciting for "JAPHs in a Nutshell"! -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL

RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Andrew . Savige
Ronald J Kimball wrote: > ''=~("(?{".('}_).} "*}_} }./}(}_ }}_, (}_+}_,*"'& > ~'/- + *,+ < + :- /:- << :- @'| > ' `` @ `` ` @ ` ` ` ')."})"); > > Inspired by Abigail and Japhy's recent postings. > > Ronald Ronald, that was very impressive! Using your trick and ideas from Jas'

RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Selector, Lev Y
'hello3\n';})"); Warmest Regards Lev Selector New York, t. 212-902-3040 -Original Message- From: Ronald J Kimball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:38 PM To: Selector, Lev Y Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JAPHs with no unsightly lett

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Ronald J Kimball
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:25:42PM -0400, Selector, Lev Y wrote: > Ronald, > Thank you. > This was good. > Here how it was done, right? > == > > $s1 = '}_).} "*}_} }./}(}_ }}_, (}_+}_,*"'; > $s2 = '/- + *,+ < + :- /:- << :- @'; > $s3

RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Selector, Lev Y
Warmest Regards Lev Selector ficc-oefeedback, New York, t. 212-902-3040 -Original Message- From: Ronald J Kimball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JAP

RE: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Bicknell, Frank
19) 392-3798 > -Original Message- > From: Ronald J Kimball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:09 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers > > > > Please disregard th

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Ronald J Kimball
Please disregard the previous message. This one contains the correct code. (Damn KDE clipboard!) On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:09AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have found all the JAPHs with no alphanumeric > characters both interesting and instructive. > However, none of them write to

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Robin Houston
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:56:26AM -0400, Ronald J Kimball wrote: > ''=~("(?{".('}_).} "*}_} }./}(}_ }}_, (}_+}_,*"'& > /- + *,+ < + :- /:- << :- @'| > ' `` @ `` ` @ ` ` ` ')."})"); syntax error at - line 2, near "/- + *,+ < + :- /:" Can't find string terminator "" anywher

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-16 Thread Ronald J Kimball
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:09AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have found all the JAPHs with no alphanumeric > characters both interesting and instructive. > However, none of them write to stdout, > since they all use the `$_` trick. > > This leads me to conjecture that: > > It is impos

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-15 Thread Andrew . Savige
I have found all the JAPHs with no alphanumeric characters both interesting and instructive. However, none of them write to stdout, since they all use the `$_` trick. This leads me to conjecture that: It is impossible to write a JAPH that writes to stdout without using at least one alphanumeri

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Ilmari Karonen
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Larry Shatzer wrote: > > You confused deparse, good job :o) Although it's not really that hard, particularly for older versions of B::Deparse. (The one in bleadperl deparses this just fine.) -- Ilmari Karonen - http://www.sci.fi/~iltzu/ "That wasn't a cat, that was a spa

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Larry Shatzer
On Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:31 "Michael J Assels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Are there other ways to do it with no letters? > > What about no numbers too? > > Here's one with no letters, numbers, parentheses, brackets > or braces: > [JAPH] > >

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Michael J Assels
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Robin Houston wrote: > Once upon a time, www.perl.org (when it was the Perl Institute) > had an occasional Perl competition. One of the winning entries > to that was a delightful JAPH-alike (it printed the author's name > IIRC) containing no alphanumeric characters. Does an

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Ronald J Kimball
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:31:50AM -0400, Michael J Assels wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Are there other ways to do it with no letters? > > What about no numbers too? > > Here's one with no letters, numbers, parentheses, brackets > or braces: Also no whitespa

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Robin Houston
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 03:03:33PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Are there other ways to do it with no letters? > What about no numbers too? Once upon a time, www.perl.org (when it was the Perl Institute) had an occasional Perl competition. One of the winning entries to that was a delightful

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Michael J Assels
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Are there other ways to do it with no letters? > What about no numbers too? Here's one with no letters, numbers, parentheses, brackets or braces: $@='@'^'@';$_='!'&~'"';$/='"'&~'!';$^='$'&~'!';$,='*'&~'#'; $:='$'&'"';$~='?'^'/';$\=$_|'@';$;=$:|$/

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 10:27:53AM +0200, Sven Neuhaus wrote: > Might as well write ... OpenGL to a framebuffer. That I'd love to see. -- Pretty, smart, sane:Pick two. - Ron Echeverri

Re: JAPHs with no unsightly letters or numbers

2001-08-14 Thread Sven Neuhaus
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 03:03:33PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > With regard to JAPH standards: > 1) Should a JAPH write to stdout, stderr, /dev/tty > or any of these? Doesn't really matter. Might as well write postscript into a file, or OpenGL to a framebuffer. > Maybe there should be