Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

Beniamino Cenci Goga said: >I would suggest the lowendmac.com, where we all come from! Thanks, that was too obvious. -- G-Books is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Check our web site for refurbished PowerB

Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

> BTW. Stay away from the 233 cacheless and from any 12" and 13" screen. Personally I feel the 13in problems are overstated - a loose cable that can be easily fixed with tape is the only screen issue I've seen in a dozen of them. I agree with the 12in FTSN, if you intend running X. -- Best wi

Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

Macopinion. Anyone know of a complete Wallstreet/PDQ online spec? I would suggest the lowendmac.com, where we all come from! At the bottom of each page you'll find a link to the Apple specifications. Ben BTW. Stay away from the 233 cacheless and from any 12" and 13" screen. -- G-Books is sponsored

Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

Malcolm Cornelius said: >The 12in is lower res - 832 x 624 rather than the 1024 x 768 of the 13 & 14. Ok, my bad. I have been very ignorant of any 12" model, I'm afraid. Everymac doesn't specify the 12". The cacheless Wallstreet 12" seem to also have been available in 800 x 600 pixels, as I saw th

Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

On 4/3/05 3:39 AM, "Malcolm Cornelius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Is one with a 12" screen really the exact same size overall ... > > The 12in is lower res - 832 x 624 rather than the 1024 x 768 of the 13 & 14. The 12" also came in a passive AND an active matrix display. Make sure you

Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

>> Is one with a 12" screen really the exact same size overall as >> those with 13.3" and 14.1" screens, and even Lombards? > > The display have the same amount of pixels in each model on a smaller > area, but the machines themselves are exactly as big as is the display > house, so there's only m

Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

alienbill said: >Is one with a 12" screen really the exact same size overall as >those with 13.3" and 14.1" screens, and even Lombards? The display have the same amount of pixels in each model on a smaller area, but the machines themselves are exactly as big as is the display house, so there's

Re: Wallstreet-more confusion

On 01/04/05 15:44, "alienbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to those who cleared up my questions about Wallstreet ram. Now I am > similarly confused on the size of these units. I had thought to look for a > 12.1" screen model reasoning that it would be physically more compact. > Again on th

Wallstreet-more confusion

Thanks to those who cleared up my questions about Wallstreet ram. Now I am similarly confused on the size of these units. I had thought to look for a 12.1" screen model reasoning that it would be physically more compact. Again on the Apple site, I see the exact same measurements given for all W