Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-19 Thread patrick fisher
> They are dogs, but I like mine. Always in awe of the design. > > The first generation Wallstreet was available with a 12" passive matrix LCD > with both the cacheless 233, and the 250Mhz model. The units with the 12" > Passive Matrix LCD came with only 2 Meg VRAM. The 13.3" and 14.1" screen >

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-19 Thread William Ove
> Subject: Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN > From: "Chrys R. Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The Kanga runs at 250MHz with 50MHz bus speed. The 250MHz Wallstreet uses a > logic board running at 83MHz, as does the 292MHz WS. The cache- less 233MHz > (aka M

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-17 Thread Chrys R. Cruz
> If I replace the boards as needed are the new boards NOS or are they revisions > that are more reliable? Why would replacement boards be more reliable, or do > these things have a MTBF that I am going to bump up against regardless? I > used a Ebay 250mhz bd and the price was 40$ so it was chea

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-16 Thread Art Montes De Oca
Kyle Hansen wrote: > > > Yes. The PMU board, Charge card and Power Supply frequently go on them. It > is a turkey shoot to figure out which board is the culprit. I can field > strip a wallstreet in the dark. I have opened them so many times. Once you > replace those 3 boards though, they ar

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Hansen
Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > I believe that the Wallstreet I Series was made of a 233, 250 and a 292, > while the second revision had a better 233, a 266 and a 300. Yep. There was a 250MHz version of the PowerBook G3 in the Wallstreet style case. There was also a 250MHz G3 in a 3400 style cas

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-16 Thread Laurent Daudelin
On 16/04/02 15:49, "Kyle Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Art Montes De Oca wrote: > >> I have just replaced my 250mhz WS processor board for the second time, >> The first time it was covered by Apple. This time (5 months later) the >> same symptoms...ie the machine went dead..wouldnt boot,

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Hansen
Art Montes De Oca wrote: > I have just replaced my 250mhz WS processor board for the second time, > The first time it was covered by Apple. This time (5 months later) the > same symptoms...ie the machine went dead..wouldnt boot, screen black, no > > chime ,... and no warranty. I took a chance

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Hansen
Art Montes De Oca wrote: > I have just replaced my 250mhz WS processor board for the second time, > The first time it was covered by Apple. This time (5 months later) the > same symptoms...ie the machine went dead..wouldnt boot, screen black, no > > chime ,... and no warranty. I took a chance

Re: Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-16 Thread Laurent Daudelin
On 16/04/02 12:54, "Art Montes De Oca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have just replaced my 250mhz WS processor board for the second time, > The first time it was covered by Apple. This time (5 months later) the > same symptoms...ie the machine went dead..wouldnt boot, screen black, no > > chim

Wallstreet procrssor board failure AGAIN

2002-04-16 Thread Art Montes De Oca
I have just replaced my 250mhz WS processor board for the second time, The first time it was covered by Apple. This time (5 months later) the same symptoms...ie the machine went dead..wouldnt boot, screen black, no chime ,... and no warranty. I took a chance and guessed it was the same proble