Re: lombard 10.3

2004-12-02 Thread Mikael Byström
Bob said: a number of (but not all) Wallstreet users had difficulties installing Panther when their Wallstreet had more than 384 MB of RAM. If I remember correctly this was only during installation. Post installation modules could be put back. -- G-Books is sponsored by

Re: lombard 10.3

2004-12-01 Thread Bob
The National Enquirer reports at 2:45 PM -0500 11/30/04, Richard Smykla wrote: snip Some Lombard machines reportedly do not have this issue, but the ones I've seen do. Mine would install with a 256 in either slot, as long as the machine did not have more than 384 MB installed. Perhaps it is a

Re: lombard 10.3

2004-11-30 Thread Richard Smykla
Hi, Gladys and Linda. If you put a 128 MB module in (or a combination of 2 64s or 128s) the install should go smoothly (but slowly). After which, you should be able to reinstall the larger RAM sticks and run mostly problem-free. I believe there's an undocumented problem with having 256MB sticks

lombard 10.3

2004-11-29 Thread gladys pérez-almiroty
hi: i am trying to upgrade my aunt's lombard. i installed 256 ram in the lower slot and a 60gb 7200 rpm's hd. when i tried to install os 10.3 all went fine up to a point in which the screen turned into a series of static big blue, black and white lines or a pattern of thin lines jumping all

Re: lombard 10.3

2004-11-29 Thread Steve Fuller
i am trying to upgrade my aunt's lombard. i installed 256 ram in the lower slot and a 60gb 7200 rpm's hd. when i tried to install os 10.3 all went fine up to a point in which the screen turned into a series of static big blue, black and white lines or a pattern of thin lines jumping all over