- Original Message -
From: "David Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Megillot] Hasmoneans, control and not
I read carefully and do not agree.
I didn't expect you to. Who live
As an industrial
suburb Qumran had too great a strategic and utilitarian value for it
to be a 'closed theological society'.
David
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:16 PM
Subject: [Megillot] Hasmoneans, control and not
Quotin
gical society'.
David
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:16 PM
Subject: [Megillot] Hasmoneans, control and not
Quoting David Stacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[]
(Hasmoneans would not have tolerated any sort of 'ind
Quoting David Stacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[]
(Hasmoneans would not have tolerated any sort of 'independent' Qumran
not under its control).
[]
Statements such as the above are not rare. But, I suggest, such statements may
be more asserted than demonstrated. Hasmoneans did not prevent,
