Howdy,
I tried a QS processor in an earlier G4 chassis today. It did not
work, and I am wondering what to try next. The G4 was an older model
than I expected. It is a Sawtooth model. I made the extra 12V
connection, as specified. The system would not boot at all with the QS
processor. I no
On Jun 22, 2009, at 12:03 AM, Ralph Green wrote:
> I tried a QS processor in an earlier G4 chassis today. It did not
> work, and I am wondering what to try next. The G4 was an older model
> than I expected. It is a Sawtooth model.
There are two basic later G4 processor types: 133 MHz bus and
Absolutely. However, I wouldn't get one off of eBay.
I just recently bought one from OWC. It is a 1.6Ghz. It required an
installation program which ran off a CD which required booting off the
CD, pressing the programmer switch and then booting up and running a
program which modified the boot rom,
My SuperScan Mc 611 RasterOps monitor is looking a little pink these
days, so I am interested in buying a new LCD style monitor to use
with my B&W. Sonnet G-4 upgrade.
Can anyone give me an idea of what to look for in a new monitor? Specs?
I do mostly music arranging, so I need good resoluti
On Jun 19, 10:37 am, Bruce Johnson
wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote:
>
> > If the battery is alive and the machine does not start you might try
> > cleaning the battery contacts in the holder. Sometimes just spinning
> > the battery in place is enough to brea
On Jun 19, 12:17 pm, Clark Martin wrote:
> Bruce Johnson wrote:
> > Well, "Media Computer" is a bit more grandiloquent than "computer
> > attached to the teevee for the purposes of playing music, watching
> > video podcasts, DVD's and surfing the web".
> > I'm not doing DVR or anything fancy
On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:59 AM, trag wrote:
>
> Have either of you two considered MythTV? It takes a bit of
> fiddling, but you're both pros at that.
>
> http://www.mythtv.org
Haven't looked into it in a while, but my old G4 just does not have
the horsepower to do a lot of that stuff. Were I to
On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:57 AM, trag wrote:
>>
>> And we have a winner!
>
> Apparently, tiny bits of oxidation, or something can build up on
> contacts. When my VCR or TV remote stops working, I take the
> batteries out, swap their positions, put them back in, and I'm good
> for another several mo
ok, got this 2.5 sata drive plugged into this 3.5 enclosure...
question: can the power supplied to the 3.5 enclosure be too much for
this 2.5 drive? (what I'm doing is "testing" the enclosure to see if
it's good, and the only drive I have to use is a 2.5 sata drive from a
mac mini). Jeff
trag wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 19, 12:17 pm, Clark Martin wrote:
>> Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>>> Well, "Media Computer" is a bit more grandiloquent than "computer
>>> attached to the teevee for the purposes of playing music, watching
>>> video podcasts, DVD's and surfing the web".
>
>>> I'm not doing
Lawrence David Eden wrote:
> My SuperScan Mc 611 RasterOps monitor is looking a little pink these
> days, so I am interested in buying a new LCD style monitor to use
> with my B&W. Sonnet G-4 upgrade.
>
> Can anyone give me an idea of what to look for in a new monitor? Specs?
>
> I do mostly
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:03 PM, MacGuy wrote:
> ok, got this 2.5 sata drive plugged into this 3.5 enclosure...
> question: can the power supplied to the 3.5 enclosure be too much for
> this 2.5 drive?
I've always gone by the rule that if they have exactly the same
connectors then they are/should
On Jun 22, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
>
> My SuperScan Mc 611 RasterOps monitor is looking a little pink these
> days, so I am interested in buying a new LCD style monitor to use
> with my B&W. Sonnet G-4 upgrade.
>
> Can anyone give me an idea of what to look for in a new mon
On Jun 22, 2009, at 10:03 AM, MacGuy wrote:
>
> ok, got this 2.5 sata drive plugged into this 3.5 enclosure...
> question: can the power supplied to the 3.5 enclosure be too much for
> this 2.5 drive? (what I'm doing is "testing" the enclosure to see if
> it's good, and the only drive I have to
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Bruce
Johnson wrote:
>
> No. So long as you can connect them (and both 2.5" and 3.5" drives
> require the same voltages) things should work out fine.
I don't know how pertinent to this thread this is, but I'm not
positive they use the same voltages.
I agree that
On 6/22/2009 9:53 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:59 AM, trag wrote:
>
>
>> Have either of you two considered MythTV? It takes a bit of
>> fiddling, but you're both pros at that.
>>
>> http://www.mythtv.org
>>
>
> Haven't looked into it in a while, but my old G4 just do
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
>
> Can anyone give me an idea of what to look for in a new monitor? Specs?
I don't consider myself very knowledgeable about monitors ... I'm
partially color blind for one thing ... so I wasn't going to say
anything.
In hindsight I sup
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:14 AM, John Martz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Bruce
> Johnson wrote:
>>
>> No. So long as you can connect them (and both 2.5" and 3.5" drives
>> require the same voltages) things should work out fine.
>
> I don't know how pertinent to this thread this is, b
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:11 AM, nestamicky wrote:
>
> I second Bruce on this one, I think a Linux box would do just fine. I
> can't seem to find on their site though who it pulls video into the
> machinejust through the cat5? Or, does the machine need a
> capture card?
yeah hardware specs c
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:34 AM, MacGuy wrote:
> Well after plugging the 2.5 into the I/O board and the power supply,
> the 2.5 booted and ran fine. However when the 3.5 drive was used, it
> wouldn't even mount on the desktop? This icydock enclosure has always
> given me grief when it was hooked up
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:14 AM, John Martz wrote:
>
> Well after plugging the 2.5 into the I/O board and the power supply,
> the 2.5 booted and ran fine. However when the 3.5 drive was used, it
> wouldn't even mount on the desktop? This icydock enclosure has always
> given me grief when it w
John Martz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Bruce
> Johnson wrote:
>> No. So long as you can connect them (and both 2.5" and 3.5" drives
>> require the same voltages) things should work out fine.
>
> I don't know how pertinent to this thread this is, but I'm not
> positive they use the s
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:34 AM, MacGuy wrote:
>
>> Well after plugging the 2.5 into the I/O board and the power supply,
>> the 2.5 booted and ran fine. However when the 3.5 drive was used, it
>> wouldn't even mount on the desktop? This icydo
On Jun 22, 1:14 am, Po-en Tsai wrote:
> On 22/06/2009, at 4:59 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>
>
>
> > Where do I find the password this program keeps asking for?
> > It is NOT my Keychain PW as I know this one.
>
> Have you tried your normal password? I don't see why Disk Utility
> would ask for a
i got a question maybe someone can answer i know the slot loading imac had
harmon kardon speakers.
now my question is this was the single speaker that came with any of the
powermac models made by harmon kardon and if its not a harmon kardon then who
made it? and what macs had shipped with with i
On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Roger Deghetto wrote:
> i got a question maybe someone can answer i know the slot loading
> imac had harmon kardon speakers.
> now my question is this was the single speaker that came with any of
> the powermac models made by harmon kardon and if its not a harmon
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM, MacGuy wrote:
>
> This icydock enclosure has always
> given me grief when it was hooked up via USB... it would "unmount"
> itself after 3 mins or less time plugged/ mounted on the desktop? This
> must be a power supply issue then... wonder where to get another powe
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
> The standard 3.5" & 5.25" drive power connector supplies +12V and +5V.
> 2.5" drives only need 5V so they would just use that power line. There
> is no 3.3V line on drive power cables.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Yes, I think all the
On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:51 PM, insightinmind wrote:
>> On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:14 AM, John Martz wrote:
>> Well after plugging the 2.5 into the I/O board and the power supply,
>> the 2.5 booted and ran fine. However when the 3.5 drive was used, it
>> wouldn't even mount on the desktop? This icydock
John Martz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
>> The standard 3.5" & 5.25" drive power connector supplies +12V and +5V.
>> 2.5" drives only need 5V so they would just use that power line. There
>> is no 3.3V line on drive power cables.
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you
On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:08 PM, insightinmind wrote:
> I guess I should have also asked ... how did you know the 2.5 drive
> was working? Did it mount on your desktop? and was that through the
> USB? Did you decide the 2.5 and 3.5 both required the same voltage?
>
> If all true, it sounds more like
> Date: Mon, Jun 22 2009 5:22 am
> From: Lawrence David Eden
>
>
> My SuperScan Mc 611 RasterOps monitor is looking a little pink these
> days, so I am interested in buying a new LCD style monitor to use
> with my B&W. Sonnet G-4 upgrade.
>
> Can anyone give me an idea of what to look for in a ne
On Jun 22, 8:22 am, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
> My SuperScan Mc 611 RasterOps monitor is looking a little pink these
> days, so I am interested in buying a new LCD style monitor to use
> with my B&W. Sonnet G-4 upgrade.
>
> Can anyone give me an idea of what to look for in a new monitor? Spe
On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:23 PM, MacGuy wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:08 PM, insightinmind wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried the 3.5 drive elsewhere? (apologies if you state this
>> earlier in the thread).
>
> 2.5 mounted on the desktop via USB, I booted from a leopard volume on
> it..all looked ok. Th
On Jun 22, 2009, at 1:03 PM, MacGuy wrote:
>
> ok, got this 2.5 sata drive plugged into this 3.5 enclosure...
> question: can the power supplied to the 3.5 enclosure be too much for
> this 2.5 drive? (what I'm doing is "testing" the enclosure to see if
> it's good, and the only drive I have to us
On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:35 PM, insightinmind wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:23 PM, MacGuy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:08 PM, insightinmind wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you tried the 3.5 drive elsewhere? (apologies if you state this
>>> earlier in the thread).
>>
>> 2.5 mounted on the desktop vi
> As for the one I'm having troubles with:
> http://www.icydock.com/product/mb664us-1s.html
> It has esata.. and funny that you'd ask, yes it worked great via esata
> connection. And lastly, no, it's not under warranty. Jeff
OK, I'm stumped and am now waiting for someone else to post the
"obviou
On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:55 PM, John Martz wrote:
>
>> As for the one I'm having troubles with:
>> http://www.icydock.com/product/mb664us-1s.html
>> It has esata.. and funny that you'd ask, yes it worked great via
>> esata
>> connection. And lastly, no, it's not under warranty. Jeff
>
> OK, I'm
On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:55 PM, John Martz wrote:
> Is there a "big" difference between the capacities of the two drives?
2.5" SATA has the very same power and data connectors as all current
3.5" SATA.
2.5" SATA goes to 500 GB.
3.5" SATA goes to 1.5 TB (1500 GB), with 2 TB (2000 GB) being samp
On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:55 PM, John Martz wrote:
>
>> As for the one I'm having troubles with: http://www.icydock.com/
>> product/mb664us-1s.html
>> It has esata.. and funny that you'd ask, yes it worked great via
>> esata
>> connection. And lastly, no, it's not under warranty. Jeff
>
> OK, I'm
On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:55 PM, John Martz wrote:
>
>> As for the one I'm having troubles with:
>> http://www.icydock.com/product/mb664us-1s.html
>> It has esata.. and funny that you'd ask, yes it worked great via
>> esata
>> connection. And lastly, no, it's not under warranty. Jeff
>
> OK, I'm
> I honestly don't know why the thing works with everything "BUT" 3.5
> drives using the USB interface? just strange.
Is the size of the drive that's not working, making it push on
something USB internally, that is shutting down that capability?
2.5 small ... 3.5 bigger ... i.e., does size m
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:24 PM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>
>> I honestly don't know why the thing works with everything "BUT" 3.5
>> drives using the USB interface? just strange.
>
>
> Is the size of the drive that's not working, making it push on
> something USB internally, that is shutting down that
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:24 PM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>
>> I honestly don't know why the thing works with everything "BUT" 3.5
>> drives using the USB interface? just strange.
>
>
> Is the size of the drive that's not working, making it push on
> something USB internally, that is shutting down tha
On 6/22/09, Al Poulin wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 1:14 am, Po-en Tsai wrote:
>> On 22/06/2009, at 4:59 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Where do I find the password this program keeps asking for?
>> > It is NOT my Keychain PW as I know this one.
>>
>> Have you tried your normal password? I don'
On Jun 22, 12:03 am, Ralph Green wrote:
> Howdy,
[snip]
> Or, it could be that this
> hack does not work on the Sawtooth. Any thoughts?
We've been through this argument before.
There was a guy selling modified board from 133mhz bus to work on
100mhz, listed a bunch on ebay consecutively w/ no
46 matches
Mail list logo
