-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Bob's G5 odyssey
Date:Thursday, 26. April 2012
From:Cameron Kaiser spec...@floodgap.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
I may be wrong, but is there a liquid cooled 2.3 GHz?
Sorry, I should have clarified. Yes, neither
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Bob's G5 odyssey
Date:Thursday, 26. April 2012
From:Cameron Kaiser spec...@floodgap.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
I would not get the LCS 2.7 or 2.3.
I may be wrong, but is there a liquid cooled 2.3 GHz?
Sorry, I
I may be wrong, but is there a liquid cooled 2.3 GHz?
Sorry, I should have clarified. Yes, neither 2.3 is LCS, but the later 2.3
of that same generation seems to be inferior to the previous 2.3.
Sorry for my misunderstanding.
If I may ask: what's the problem with the Early 2005 2.3
My MDD pulls 155-170 watts (monitor off) just twiddling it's
thumbs. It is _massively_ hot.
That's pretty high, even for a wind tunnel Mac. My dual 1.8GHz MDD (using
an aftermarket Sonnet G4 card) pulls around 140, but it is usually in OS 9,
so OS X might flog it harder. The G4 card also has
-- Original message --
Subject: Bob's G5 odyssey
Date:Wednesday, 25. April 2012
From:various
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
My MDD pulls 155-170 watts (monitor off) just twiddling it's
thumbs. It is _massively_ hot.
That's pretty high, even for a wind tunnel
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Bob's G5 odyssey
Date:Wednesday, 25. April 2012
From:Cameron Kaiser spec...@floodgap.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
As for the Quad: in my opinion they are still very expensive and you will
get an old liquid cooled system
I would not get the LCS 2.7 or 2.3.
I may be wrong, but is there a liquid cooled 2.3 GHz?
Sorry, I should have clarified. Yes, neither 2.3 is LCS, but the later 2.3
of that same generation seems to be inferior to the previous 2.3.
--
personal:
