RE: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-11 Thread Stewie de Young
Would the replacement of the port be the answer, is there an electronic issue from some controller on the board possible? The Cube boards aren't too costly but the PM G5 Dual 2.7 isn't that easy to find, so that's the one I want to repair. John Carmonne Yorba Linda USA Sent from my

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-11 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Stewie de Young wrote: Would the replacement of the port be the answer, is there an electronic issue from some controller on the board possible? The Cube boards aren't too costly but the PM G5 Dual 2.7 isn't that easy to find, so that's the one I want

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-11 Thread Kris Tilford
On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:03 AM, John Carmonne wrote: I found that the FW ports on the Genesys Logic inc. housings would not mount but the USB does. Genesys Logic should be avoided at all costs. I've never seen a Genesys Logic chipset work under any OS; Windows, Linux or Mac. I've had

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-11 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 11, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Kris Tilford wrote: On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:03 AM, John Carmonne wrote: I found that the FW ports on the Genesys Logic inc. housings would not mount but the USB does. Genesys Logic should be avoided at all costs. I've never seen a Genesys Logic chipset

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-11 Thread Dennis Myhand
John Carmonne wrote: On Jul 11, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Kris Tilford wrote: On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:03 AM, John Carmonne wrote: I found that the FW ports on the Genesys Logic inc. housings would not mount but the USB does. Genesys Logic should be avoided at all costs. I've never seen a Genesys

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-11 Thread Illirik Smirnov
I have a lot of problems with FW on my Cubes. I just gave up a long time ago. Sent from a computer running either the SPARC, Itanium, or PowerPC architecture. On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Dennis Myhand dmyh...@suddenlink.netwrote: John Carmonne wrote: On Jul 11, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Kris

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-11 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 11, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Illirik Smirnov wrote: I have a lot of problems with FW on my Cubes. I just gave up a long time ago. Well, I always get them going again one way or another I think the chip set like Kris says is very important in a lot of the PPC Macs, I just found that to be

Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
Hi All I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz machines. The Cubes seem to be somewhat problem prone compared to the TiBooks. Both have the same 10.4.11 the Cubes have 1.5 GB Ram and the TiBooks have 1 GB Ram. Otherwise AFAICT all

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Dan
At 8:45 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz machines. The Cubes seem to be somewhat problem prone compared to the TiBooks. Both have the same 10.4.11 the Cubes have 1.5 GB Ram and the

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Mike Linnett
Obviously the cubes want you to give them to me! What sort of issues? Could it be worth cloning one of the ti book hard drives to one of the cubes? If all runs well from there, it probably means it's a hardware issue at least? Otherwise, take em apart and give everything (especially contacts) a

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Dan wrote: At 8:45 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz machines. The Cubes seem to be somewhat problem prone compared to the TiBooks. Both have the same

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Mike Linnett wrote: Obviously the cubes want you to give them to me! What sort of issues? Could it be worth cloning one of the ti book hard drives to one of the cubes? If all runs well from there, it probably means it's a hardware issue at least? Otherwise,

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Eric Herbert
The Cubes seem like one of those products that was a good idea at the time, but just poorly implemented. I've owned 2 450 MHz models and both have similar problems to what you describe. Both of mine were sent in for a switch repair procedure when they were new, so they don't have issues with

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Dan
At 9:21 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: On Jul 10, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Dan wrote: At 8:45 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz machines. The Cubes seem to be somewhat problem

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Eric Herbert wrote: The Cubes seem like one of those products that was a good idea at the time, but just poorly implemented. I've owned 2 450 MHz models and both have similar problems to what you describe. Both of mine were sent in for a switch repair

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Dan wrote: At 9:21 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: On Jul 10, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Dan wrote: At 8:45 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz machines. The Cubes seem to be somewhat problem prone compared to the TiBooks. Both have the same 10.4.11 the Cubes have 1.5 GB Ram and the TiBooks have 1 GB Ram. Otherwise AFAICT all

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Dan wrote: At 9:21 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: On Jul 10, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Dan wrote: At 8:45 AM -0700 7/10/2010, John Carmonne wrote: I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Eric Herbert
On Jul 10, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Dan wrote: Firewire can be twitchy. You using known good cables etc? And when you have problems, what is being thrown into the system log? It can be? I can't say I've ever had a problem with Firewire other than intermittent flakiness on the Cube. I

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Eric Herbert wrote: On Jul 10, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Dan wrote: Firewire can be twitchy. You using known good cables etc? And when you have problems, what is being thrown into the system log? It can be? I can't say I've ever had a problem with

RE: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Stewie de Young
I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz machines. The Cubes seem to be somewhat problem prone compared to the TiBooks. Both have the same 10.4.11 the Cubes have 1.5 GB Ram and the TiBooks have 1 GB Ram. Otherwise

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Stewie de Young wrote: I have a question about the reliability of some Macs. I have two G4 Cube 500MHz and two Tibook 500MHz machines. The Cubes seem to be somewhat problem prone compared to the TiBooks. Both have the same 10.4.11 the Cubes have 1.5

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Jonas Ulrich
I agree with Mike. Clean all the contacts, and check to see if it is a hardware problem or a software problem. Since you know the Ti-books are reliable, use target disk mode and boot the cubes off of the Ti-Book's hard drive. -Jonas -- You received this message because you are a member of

RE: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Stewie de Young
Yes, Stewie that's my drill also, I just think maybe because all my cubes were somewhat used that maybe the logic boards are a little fuzzy. But the AHT and all the other stuff I have for testing always say OK, and I have a lot of different flavors:-) BTW thanks for the firmware info

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread John Carmonne
On Jul 10, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Stewie de Young wrote: Yes, Stewie that's my drill also, I just think maybe because all my cubes were somewhat used that maybe the logic boards are a little fuzzy. But the AHT and all the other stuff I have for testing always say OK, and I have a lot

Re: Cube vs TiBook reliablity

2010-07-10 Thread Kris Tilford
On Jul 10, 2010, at 11:24 PM, John Carmonne wrote: Would the replacement of the port be the answer, is there an electronic issue from some controller on the board possible? The Cube boards aren't too costly but the PM G5 Dual 2.7 isn't that easy to find, so that's the one I want to repair.