On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:18 AM, Stewie de Young wrote:
Probably not as it has a 32mb cache despite the difference in RPMs.
At a rough guess I'd say a SATA 7200RPM drive with a 16mb cache
would perform much the same as this drive with the 32mb cache
( depending on what you have in there alrea
> From: billycarm...@verizon.net
> Currently have good success with a 1TB Seagate SATA and a Firmtek
> Seritek 1S2 SATA Controller on my Digital Audio Dual 533 OS X 10.5.8.
>
> Anyone have experience with the so-called energy efficient "LP" Seagate?
> http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Seagate/S
