Re: Eudora replacement

As of a week ago, I do not think 6.2.4 runs perfectly well on 10.5 on a PPC. My mail server just started insisting we use SSL, and after struggling with every possible little detail endlessly I still can not send or receive any more. I have 20 years of e-mail in Eudora, and wished to keep runnin

Re: Eudora replacement

At 3:31 PM -0500 01/20/2014, Jay Koutavas wrote: At 11:32 AM -0800 1/20/14, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > I won't be supporting OS 9.1, sorry. Would you support PowerPC, preferably 10.4+? No. The whole point of this exercise would be to move past PPC, so "Redora" (redone Eudora) could run on Mac O

Re: Eudora replacement

On Jan 21, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Guy Plunkett III wrote: > I don't see that this thread has actually been moved to the MacIntel group > yet ... still awaiting my subscription to kick in. Please be reminded that LEM Group Managers occasionally close down off-topic threads, but we do not move threa

Re: Eudora replacement

I don't see that this thread has actually been moved to the MacIntel group yet ... still awaiting my subscription to kick in. Eudora 6.2.4 behaves well enough under OSX 10.6.8 that I continue to use it day in and day out. It is *one* of the reasons that Snow Leopard is the OS I'm stopping at un

Re: Eudora replacement

I used Eudora mail a long time ago, it was just the best. Then I changed to Apple Mail since it was integrated into the Mac OSX operating system. I was Okay with it until OSX 9.x.x it was a mess, then OSX 10.1.x and not it is the worst client eMail around. Like the other responders I would use

[Manager Comment] Re: Eudora replacement

On Jan 20, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote: I won't be supporting OS 9.1, sorry. >>> >>> Would you support PowerPC, preferably 10.4+? >> >> No. The whole point of this exercise would be to move past PPC, so >> "Redora" (redone Eudora) could run on Mac OS X 10.7 and later. Eudora >>

Re: Eudora replacement

> > > I won't be supporting OS 9.1, sorry. > > > > Would you support PowerPC, preferably 10.4+? > > No. The whole point of this exercise would be to move past PPC, so > "Redora" (redone Eudora) could run on Mac OS X 10.7 and later. Eudora > 6.2 PPC runs fine on Mac OS 10.6.8, but breaks on 10.7+

Re: Eudora replacement

At 11:32 AM -0800 1/20/14, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > I won't be supporting OS 9.1, sorry. Would you support PowerPC, preferably 10.4+? No. The whole point of this exercise would be to move past PPC, so "Redora" (redone Eudora) could run on Mac OS X 10.7 and later. Eudora 6.2 PPC runs fine on

Re: Eudora replacement

> I won't be supporting OS 9.1, sorry. Would you support PowerPC, preferably 10.4+? -- personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com -- If the French were really intelligent, they'd sp

Re: Eudora replacement

On Sunday, January 19, 2014 7:51:37 AM UTC-6, Jay Koutavas wrote: > > Now that MailForge is dead, I've been pondering... > > How many people would be interested in a faithful reproduction of Mac > Eudora 6.2? 10? 100?, 1000? > I would love to see a modern email client which mimics Eudora. I'v

Re: Eudora replacement

Hi Doug. At 9:50 PM -0700 1/19/14, Doug McNutt wrote: 1) You need to become acquainted with : Reply-To: Eudora for the Mac List-ID: Eudora for the Mac Okay. 2) There are two different problems with Eudora. Email has changed and Apple wants iOS and OS-neXt to be written in X-code and ob

Re: Eudora replacement

Wonderful, Jay! I've been using Eudora since Apple ][c with handbuilt 1200/75 modem, and will stick with OS 10.6.8 until Eudora surfaces in a Mavericks or greater, version. I too, would be happy to pay, and beta test! Best wishes, James Now that MailForge is dead, I've been pondering...

Re: Eudora replacement

At 5:51 -0800 1/19/14, Jay Koutavas wrote: >Now that MailForge is dead, I've been pondering... > >How many people would be interested in a faithful reproduction of Mac Eudora >6.2? 10? 100?, 1000? > >Probably 100, by the likes of the FB page. > >I use Mac Eudora v6.2 every day, since the mid 90s.

Re: Eudora replacement

Thank you, Jay! I've used Eudora since first getting an email account in the days of 48k modems and well before became . I'm currently using Eudora 6.2.4 on a 2009 MacBook Pro 17" and it is the main reason I have not upgraded this machine further than OS 10.6.8. I have eagerly followed thre

Re: Eudora replacement

I used and enjoyed Eudora for many years and would absolutly use it as my main email client. I am not a programmer but would be willing to help. Beta test? On Jan 19, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Jay Koutavas wrote: Now that MailForge is dead, I've been pondering... How many people would be intere

Re: Eudora replacement

Now that MailForge is dead, I've been pondering... How many people would be interested in a faithful reproduction of Mac Eudora 6.2? 10? 100?, 1000? Probably 100, by the likes of the FB page. I use Mac Eudora v6.2 every day, since the mid 90s. I'm a pro software developer. I have built stuff o

Re: [G3-5]Re: Eudora replacement

On 7/23/12 9:42 AM, Beniamino Cenci Goga at wrote: > By the way, regarding FB, there are many ways of using it: you don't need to > upload the photos of your family or tell everybody what's going on in your > life, you can even use a pen name. And it is possible to share FB photoalbuns even to

Re: Eudora replacement

> If you are from MF, why not post a poll on their own forum? Not that I ever > had any luck there - whoever approves memberships was asleep the week I > signed up so I never got the help I was looking for and ended up tossing that > idea in the trash. I am not from MF, I am just a poweruser. A

Re: Eudora replacement

On Jul 23, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Beniamino Cenci Goga wrote: Contrary to popular belief - not everyone has or even wants facebook. I concurr, but FB is a good tools to get figures. In this case we are trying to see if the number of potential users is worth the effort of improving MailForge or

Re: Eudora replacement

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Beniamino Cenci Goga wrote: > > Contrary to popular belief - not everyone has or even wants facebook. > > I concurr, but FB is a good tools to get figures. In this case we are > trying to see if the number of potential users is worth the effort of > improving MailF

Re: Eudora replacement

> Get thee over to: > > List-ID: Eudora for the Mac > > SUBSCRIBING: > Thanks, I have just subscribed and I have linked the ML info on that FB page, Ben -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for

Re: Eudora replacement

> Contrary to popular belief - not everyone has or even wants facebook. I concurr, but FB is a good tools to get figures. In this case we are trying to see if the number of potential users is worth the effort of improving MailForge or building a new app. By the way, regarding FB, there are many

Re: Eudora replacement

Contrary to popular belief - not everyone has or even wants facebook. On Jul 22, 2012, at 8:07 PM, t...@nehaia.dk wrote: > Den Søndag, 22/7 2012, 04:03, Stephen E. Bodnar skrev: >> Well, count me in but I'm not joining Facebook just to vote. >> >> Stephen >> > > me too > > /tina > > -- >

Re: Eudora replacement

Den Søndag, 22/7 2012, 04:03, Stephen E. Bodnar skrev: > Well, count me in but I'm not joining Facebook just to vote. > > Stephen > me too /tina -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Po

Re: Eudora replacement

At 08:23 +0200 7/22/12, wrote: >We have set up a Facebook page to discuss and to see how many of us are still >looking for a true Eudora replacement: > >Http://www.facebook.com/WeWantEudora Get thee over to: List-ID: Eudora for the Mac SUBSCRIBING:

Re: Eudora replacement

It's not a vote, but through FB we can have an idea of how many macusers -- Sent from my HP Pre3On 22 Jul 2012 16.03, Stephen E. Bodnar wrote: Well, count me in but I'm not joining Facebook just to vote. Stephen On 7/22/12 5:13 AM, ben...@gmail.com wrote: > We thought that MailForge could fill t

Re: Eudora replacement

Well, count me in but I'm not joining Facebook just to vote. Stephen On 7/22/12 5:13 AM, ben...@gmail.com wrote: We thought that MailForge could fill the gap, but after 5 years they are still in beta. Why FB? I think it is a good tool to get figure out how many really need a true Eudora replac

Re: Eudora replacement

We thought that MailForge could fill the gap, but after 5 years they are still in beta.Why FB? I think it is a good tool to get figure out how many really need a true Eudora replacement.-- Sent from my HP Pre3On 22 Jul 2012 13.57, Stephen E. Bodnar wrote: On 7/21/12 10:23 PM, ben...@gmail.com wrot

Re: Eudora replacement

On 7/21/12 10:23 PM, ben...@gmail.com wrote: We have set up a Facebook page to discuss and to see how many of us are still looking for a true Eudora replacement: Http://www.facebook.com/WeWantEudora -- Sent from my HP Pre3 What if you don't do Facebook? I'm in the market for a new email clien