Re: Single User mode fsck never done?

2010-07-31 Thread Dan
At 11:14 AM -0500 7/31/2010, Eric Volker wrote: How dangerous is it to run a volume without journaling? It is the journaling mechanism that lets HFS volumes survive file system corruption "events" (power loss, cache loss, etc) so cleanly. Turning off the journaling is kindof like driving at

Re: Single User mode fsck never done?

2010-07-31 Thread Eric Volker
On 07/27/2010 02:27 PM, Kris Tilford wrote: On Jul 26, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote: When you restart, it still said fsck NOT DONE, WHY is this wrong? Journaling takes care of the file system, and when a HD has journaling, fsck isn't done:

Re: Single User mode fsck never done?

2010-07-27 Thread Kris Tilford
On Jul 26, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote: When you restart, it still said fsck NOT DONE, WHY is this wrong? Journaling takes care of the file system, and when a HD has journaling, fsck isn't done:

Re: Single User mode fsck never done?

2010-07-27 Thread Dan
At 2:25 PM -0700 7/26/2010, Jonas Lopez wrote: Starting in single user mode will allow the command (fsck) to check the file system, but it NEVER SHOWS that the file system HAS been done. When you restart, it still said fsck NOT DONE, WHY is this wrong? When you first get into Single User Mod

Single User mode fsck never done?

2010-07-27 Thread Jonas Lopez
Starting in single user mode will allow the command (fsck) to check the file system, but it NEVER SHOWS that the file system HAS been done. When you restart, it still said fsck NOT DONE, WHY is this wrong? jml -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group