To complete the story:
I just got myself that Radeon card (ATI Radeon 9000 Pro 64MB DVI/ADC),
and I do find the difference DVI vs VGA very real, even on this 19"
screen. Maybe the improvement is more noticeable on this screen,
because of its high native resolution 1680x1050, I don’t know.
But befo
On Sep 21, 2009, at 6:28 AM, Geke wrote:
> But I don’t get the idea what would improve, Bruce, or what would go
> faster, dorayme?
> I’m not into gaming, by the way.
A faster video card speeds up Quartz, and hence, the whole GUI quite
noticeably, even back in the days of 10.2...windows scroll
Thanks for the comments!
So I understand that DVI will not (noticeably) improve the screen
quality over VGA.
But I don’t get the idea what would improve, Bruce, or what would go
faster, dorayme?
I’m not into gaming, by the way.
--
Geke
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rece
> Date: Sat, Sep 19 2009 8:33 am
> From: Bruce Johnson
>
> On Sep 19, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Geke wrote:
>
>> 1. Will the quality really be better with an ADC-DVI adapter (costs
>> about 20 Euros over here) ?
>>
>
> No; not really.
>
>> 2. Or would it be better to get another graphics card instead of a
On Sep 19, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Geke wrote:
> 1. Will the quality really be better with an ADC-DVI adapter (costs
> about 20 Euros over here) ?
>
No; not really.
> 2. Or would it be better to get another graphics card instead of an
> adapter ?
> I've already seen an ATI Radeon 9000 Pro for Mac fo
Go for the Radeon 9000. I have one in my MDD and it runs my 17" Studio
Display and 22" Acer LCD very well.
Chance
Geke wrote:
> I need some advice regarding graphic cards for my PowerMac.
>
> I bought a high-res display with DVI and VGA input for my G4 Digital
> Audio 466MHz, but I'm running it
I need some advice regarding graphic cards for my PowerMac.
I bought a high-res display with DVI and VGA input for my G4 Digital
Audio 466MHz, but I'm running it on VGA as the Mac's card (ATI Rage
128 Pro AGP4x) has no DVI out.
Now I'm not sure if it's because of that, but my eyes don't like thi
