All,
Thanks for all of the rather excellent advice in this thread, I greatly
appreciate it. Also in this instance, there is a (very) happy ending. Things
worked out so that my aunt was able to purchase a brand new Mac Mini, and I had
a spare monitor. She was also able to pick up a new copy o
On Jul 3, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
I'd actually encourage Snow Leopard on Intel Macs (those that can
still
run it, thanks, Apple). It is noticeably faster than 10.5, it
doesn't add
any new disadvantages, and it has much better software compatibility
--
for example, advance
Hello, Ben:
First shot, you might want to try target disk mode.
Second, would your machine host their drive?
Third, a PC with Transmac would allow you to see the data until a new
Mac can be acquired.
Good luck, (maybe a cheap Mac from Good Will?)
Bob
On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:21 PM, bdinger wrot
On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:02 AM, John Carmonne wrote:
> Tiger on Intel affords no advantage over Leopard Intel machines don't support
> "Classic" so Leopard is the way to go with the Intel's also Snow Leopard is
> the only one that needs Rosetta to run the PPC programs the Leopard runs them
> with
On Jul 3, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Ben Dinger wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:33:10PM -0700, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>> Migration assistant is pretty smart and won't move things over that'll mess
>> up the system and handles dissimilar system version well.
>
> Will it do well going from PPC to Intel?
> Tiger on Intel affords no advantage over Leopard Intel machines don't
> support "Classic" so Leopard is the way to go with the Intel's also Snow
> Leopard is the only one that needs Rosetta to run the PPC programs the
> Leopard runs them with out it.
As others have mentioned, they *all* need Ros
Sent from an iPhone, don't ask whose.
On Jul 3, 2012, at 3:02 AM, John Carmonne wrote:
>>
> Tiger on Intel affords no advantage over Leopard Intel machines don't support
> "Classic" so Leopard is the way to go with the Intel's also Snow Leopard is
> the only one that needs Rosetta to run th
On Jul 3, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Ben Dinger wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:33:10PM -0700, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>> Migration assistant is pretty smart and won't move things over that'll mess
>> up the system and handles dissimilar system version well.
>
> Will it do well going from PPC to Intel?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:28:53PM -0700, John Carmonne wrote:
>
> Just revome the drive and either insall it in the new machine or in an
> external enclosure and use CCC to transfer the volume Also if you have the
> HDD in an external I would uptate the OS to 10.5.8 that way any iMac over 867
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:33:10PM -0700, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Migration assistant is pretty smart and won't move things over that'll mess
> up the system and handles dissimilar system version well.
Will it do well going from PPC to Intel? That's one migration, oddly, I've
never done. I've a
On Jul 2, 2012, at 3:21 PM, bdinger wrote:
> Obviously I'd prefer 2, but I know that using Migration assistant all but
> requires the source to either be working, or a recent OS level. So I can
> hope that I'd find a Intel Mac for her running Tiger still, but that
> likelihood is low, and eve
On Jul 2, 2012, at 3:21 PM, bdinger wrote:
> Hi All,
> My aunt has a 17in 1.8 G5 iMac (M9843LL/A) that unfortunately seems to have a
> bad logic board. You know, comes on but with the fans set at "747" and no
> SMU or PRAM reset will do much for it. They don't have the most means-wise,
> an
Hi All,
My aunt has a 17in 1.8 G5 iMac (M9843LL/A) that unfortunately seems to have
a bad logic board. You know, comes on but with the fans set at "747" and
no SMU or PRAM reset will do much for it. They don't have the most
means-wise, and so I'm looking at options for them. Right now it's e
13 matches
Mail list logo