Hello Dannon,
That is surprising and excellent! Can't wait to hear more.
Take care,
Darren
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Dannon Baker wrote:
> Darren,
>
> While this is not currently possible, I'm currently finishing up a first pass
> on a workflow API that will allow this sort of interac
Darren,
While this is not currently possible, I'm currently finishing up a first pass
on a workflow API that will allow this sort of interaction and hope to have an
early version available by the end of this week. I can update you when that
has been committed.
-Dannon
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:2
Hi Leon,
Thanks for sharing this with the community!
As far as similar activities, we are actively working on a solution for
packaging and deploying tools. Enis can share more about that, it is what we
use already to automatically build our cloud images with all tools and data
installed.
Impo
Dear colleagues,
In order to ease administration on our servers running at VIB and
NBIC, we will set up an RPM Repository for bioinformatics tools, the
primary focus being NGS tools. The purpose is to come to a stable
repository of easily installable packages for the common
bioinformatics tools th
On Mar 2, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>>
>> P.S. I do like the color highlighting and live substitution of
>> the workflow parameters into each tool step that uses them.
>> Very slick!
>>
>
> That was the good news. Now the bad news
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>
> P.S. I do like the color highlighting and live substitution of
> the workflow parameters into each tool step that uses them.
> Very slick!
>
That was the good news. Now the bad news - two bug reports.
Firstly if you clear the workflow paramet
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Dannon Baker wrote:
>> Peter-
>>
>> Just a quick response to your first question- you might want to give
>> the workflow parameters feature a shot to see if it does what you're
>> looking to do. Within the workf
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Dannon Baker wrote:
> Peter-
>
> Just a quick response to your first question- you might want to give
> the workflow parameters feature a shot to see if it does what you're
> looking to do. Within the workflow editor, instead of setting a value to
> 'specify at ru
Peter-
Just a quick response to your first question- you might want to give the
workflow parameters feature a shot to see if it does what you're looking to do.
Within the workflow editor, instead of setting a value to 'specify at
runtime', use a variable tag in the format ${yourvariablename}.
Hi all,
I have a multi-step workflow where I've marked some parameters to be
set at run time (in this case, a minimum read length, used in two
different workflow steps). I want to use the same parameter value in
multiple tools, rather than give the user one prompt for each tool. Is
this possible?
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm aware that in an individual tool's XML wrapper you can add
> hidden="true" to the element to hide the tool from the
> listing shown in Galaxy's left hand panel (but the tool is still
> loaded and can be called by old workflows e
11 matches
Mail list logo
